Curzon M E J, Cleaton-Jones P E
Dept. of Paediatric Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, Leeds, England.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011 Aug;12(4):184-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03262804.
To provide guidance on reviewing scientific manuscripts for publication.
Scientific peer review is possibly one of the most important tasks a scientist is asked to do. It carries a great responsibility and needs to be conscientiously and thoroughly carried out. It is most important that a reviewer decides very quickly whether to undertake a review and if so to complete the task. It must at all times be objective, as positive as possible and seen as contributing to the advancement of our knowledge. This review provides suggestions as to best practice in reviewing a scientific manuscript in dentistry. The various aspects of importance: accepting or declining a review, objectivity, approaches to reading and taking notes, assessment of methods, validity and reproducibility of results and evaluating a discussion, are covered in detail and the standards that are required considered. Suggestions are made as to how a review should be reported.
为审阅科学稿件以供发表提供指导。
科学同行评审可能是科学家被要求承担的最重要任务之一。它责任重大，需要认真且全面地进行。至关重要的是，审稿人要尽快决定是否进行评审，若决定评审则要完成任务。评审必须始终保持客观，尽可能积极，并被视为有助于推动我们知识的进步。本综述针对牙科科学稿件评审的最佳实践提供建议。详细涵盖了重要的各个方面：接受或拒绝评审、客观性、阅读和做笔记的方法、对方法的评估、结果的有效性和可重复性以及对讨论部分的评估，并考虑了所需的标准。还就如何报告评审提出了建议。
