• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

所以你想成为一名审稿人。

So You Want To Be A Reviewer.

作者信息

Vogt H Bruce, Huber Victor C, Hansen Keith A

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine.

Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine.

出版信息

S D Med. 2017 Mar;70(3):127-133.

PMID:28813775
Abstract

Peer review is a process for evaluating the quality of "work" of a scientist or professional as judged by others in the same or related field. In the context of the biomedical and health sciences, it primarily pertains to review of manuscripts submitted to journals for consideration of publication, abstracts for proposed presentations at professional meetings, and competitive research grant applications. Serving as a reviewer is a scholarly pursuit and a worthwhile endeavor, assuming it is approached in a conscientious, responsible manner. The purpose of this article is to define peer review and its various forms, suggest reasons for serving as a manuscript reviewer, discuss considerations prior to accepting a review assignment, and provide guidelines for the process.

摘要

同行评审是一种由同一领域或相关领域的其他人对科学家或专业人员的“工作”质量进行评估的过程。在生物医学和健康科学领域,它主要涉及对提交给期刊以供发表考虑的手稿、在专业会议上进行拟议展示的摘要以及竞争性研究资助申请的评审。担任评审员是一项学术追求和有价值的努力,前提是要以认真、负责的态度来对待。本文的目的是定义同行评审及其各种形式,提出担任手稿评审员的理由,讨论接受评审任务之前的注意事项,并提供该过程的指导方针。

相似文献

1
So You Want To Be A Reviewer.所以你想成为一名审稿人。
S D Med. 2017 Mar;70(3):127-133.
2
Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.审稿人的评分是否受到其自身工作引用的影响?对提交手稿和同行评审报告的分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;67(3):401-406.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
3
Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.学术出版物稿件的修订。
Radiol Technol. 1997 Sep-Oct;69(1):47-54.
4
What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.在《印度儿科学》上提交的内容与被接受的内容:投稿分析、评审过程、决策制定及退稿标准
Indian Pediatr. 2006 Jun;43(6):479-89.
5
Reviewing scientific manuscripts.审阅科学手稿。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011 Aug;12(4):184-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03262804.
6
The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.稿件评审人在同行评审过程中的作用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Sep;165(3):685-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.3.7645496.
7
Peer review and refereeing in medicine and medical sciences.医学及医学科学领域的同行评审与审阅
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 1997 Sep;3(3):107-12.
8
A systematic guide for peer reviewers for a medical journal.医学期刊同行评审员系统指南。
J Med Pract Manage. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(6 Spec No):13-7.
9
Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals.关于为同行评审期刊撰写基于社区参与式研究手稿的指南。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2007 Fall;1(3):281-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0018.
10
Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.学生对提交稿件的同行评审决定与教师同行评审一样严格。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2010 Dec;34(4):170-3. doi: 10.1152/advan.00046.2010.

引用本文的文献

1
A Guide for Increasing Scholarship for Medical Educators.医学教育者学术提升指南
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1348-1351. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04948-1.