National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Dec;119(12):1806-10. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1003240. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
Although asbestos in general is well known to cause a range of neoplastic and non-neoplastic human health effects, not all asbestos fiber types have the same disease-causing potential, and the mode of action (MOA) of specific types of asbestos and related fibers for various health outcomes are not well understood.
A workshop was held to discuss the state of the science of the MOA for asbestos-related disease. The objective was to review the range of asbestos-induced health effects (including those at sites remote to the respiratory tract). We sought to identify existing knowledge gaps and define what research is needed to address these gaps and advance asbestos research.
Discussions centered on areas of uncertainty in the field, including the ways asbestos is defined and characterized, the role of different fiber characteristics (e.g., length and mineralogy) in disease, and the impact of low-dose exposures on human health. Studying the dosimetry and mode of action of multiple fiber types would enhance our understanding of asbestos-related disease. To better elucidate the MOA of specific asbestos fibers, the risk assessor requires data as to specific characteristics of asbestos in determining fiber toxicity (e.g., surface area, mineral type), which may inform efforts to assess and control exposures and prevent adverse human health outcomes for the diverse range of fiber types. Specific research aims were defined for these topics and for overarching issues to be addressed, including the use of standardized terminology, test materials, and better experimental models to aid in data extrapolation to humans.
To resolve these and other issues, participants agreed that diverse scientific disciplines must coordinate to better understand the MOA leading to the various asbestos-related disease end points.
虽然一般来说石棉会引起一系列人类肿瘤和非肿瘤健康影响,但并非所有类型的石棉纤维都具有相同的致病潜力,而且特定类型的石棉和相关纤维对各种健康结果的作用机制(MOA)也尚未完全清楚。
举办了一次研讨会,以讨论与石棉相关疾病的 MOA 科学现状。其目的是回顾石棉引起的健康影响范围(包括呼吸道以外的部位)。我们试图确定现有的知识差距,并确定需要进行哪些研究来填补这些空白并推进石棉研究。
讨论集中在该领域的不确定领域,包括石棉的定义和特征、不同纤维特征(例如,长度和矿物学)在疾病中的作用,以及低剂量暴露对人类健康的影响。研究多种纤维类型的剂量学和作用机制将增强我们对石棉相关疾病的理解。为了更好地阐明特定石棉纤维的作用机制,风险评估人员需要有关确定纤维毒性的石棉具体特征的数据(例如,表面积、矿物类型),这可能有助于评估和控制暴露并防止各种纤维类型对人类健康造成不利影响。为这些主题和需要解决的总体问题定义了具体的研究目标,包括使用标准化术语、测试材料和更好的实验模型,以帮助将数据外推至人类。
为了解决这些和其他问题,与会者一致认为,必须协调不同的科学学科,以更好地了解导致各种石棉相关疾病终点的 MOA。