Suppr超能文献

重视健康以做出临床和经济决策:对风湿病学家有意义的方向。

Valuing health for clinical and economic decisions: directions relevant for rheumatologists.

机构信息

Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1770-5. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110404.

Abstract

The quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is a construct that integrates the value or preference for a health state over the period of time in that health state. The main use of QALY is in cost-utility analysis, to help make resource allocation decisions when faced with choices. Although the concept of the QALY is appealing, there is ongoing debate regarding their usefulness and approaches to deriving QALY. In 2008, OMERACT engaged in an effort to agree on QALY approaches that can be used in rheumatology. Based on a Web questionnaire and a subsequent meeting, rheumatologists questioned whether it was relevant for OMERACT (1) to investigate use of a QALY that represents the patients' perspective, (2) to explore the validity of the visual analog scale (VAS) to value health, and (3) to understand the validity of mapping health-specific instruments on existing preference instruments. This article discusses the pros and cons of these points in light of current insight from the point of view of health economics and decision-making theory. It also considers the further research agenda toward a QALY approach in rheumatology.

摘要

质量调整生命年(QALY)是一个将健康状态的价值或偏好与该健康状态持续时间相结合的概念。QALY 的主要用途是在成本效用分析中,帮助在面临选择时做出资源分配决策。尽管 QALY 的概念很有吸引力,但对于它们的有用性以及推导 QALY 的方法仍存在持续的争论。2008 年,OMERACT 致力于就可用于风湿病学的 QALY 方法达成一致意见。基于网络问卷调查和随后的会议,风湿病学家质疑 OMERACT 是否有必要(1)调查代表患者观点的 QALY 的使用情况,(2)探讨视觉模拟量表(VAS)对健康的评估的有效性,以及(3)了解将特定于健康的工具映射到现有偏好工具上的有效性。本文从健康经济学和决策理论的角度出发,根据当前的观点,讨论了这些观点的利弊。它还考虑了在风湿病学中建立 QALY 方法的进一步研究议程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验