Doctoral School of Business and Management, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., 1093, Budapest, Hungary.
Sandoz Hungária Kft, Bartók Béla u. 43-47, 1134, Budapest, Hungary.
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Dec;37(12):1957-1977. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3800-8. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
EQ-5D is becoming the preferred instrument to measure health-state utilities involved in health technology assessment. The objective of this study is to assess the state of EQ-5D research in musculoskeletal disorders in 8 Central and Eastern European countries and to provide a meta-analysis of EQ-5D index scores. Original research articles published in any language between Jan 2000 and Sept 2016 were included, if they reported any EQ-5D outcome from at least two musculoskeletal patients from Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, or Slovenia. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Twenty-nine articles (5992 patients) were included on rheumatoid arthritis (n = 7), osteoporosis (n = 5), chronic pain (n = 5), osteoarthritis (n = 4), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 2), psoriatic arthritis (n = 2), total hip replacement (n = 2), and scleroderma (n = 2). Low back pain was under-represented, while studies in neck pain, systemic lupus erythematosus, gout, and childhood disorders were lacking. EQ-5D index scores were reported in 24 studies, while the version of the instrument and the value-set was not specified in 41% and 46% of the articles, respectively. Meta-analysis was performed on 24 disease states involving 6876 observation points. Intervention effect was reported in 22 subgroups, out of which risk of bias was low in 41%. This review provides recommendations to improve reporting standards of EQ-5D results and highlights potential areas for future research. Coordinated research in conditions with greatest public health impact as well as a development of a regional value-set could provide locally relevant health-state utilities that are transferable among countries within the region.
EQ-5D 正成为评估卫生技术的健康状态效用的首选工具。本研究旨在评估 8 个中东欧国家肌肉骨骼疾病中 EQ-5D 研究的状况,并对 EQ-5D 指数得分进行荟萃分析。纳入了 2000 年 1 月至 2016 年 9 月间以任何语言发表的原始研究文章,如果它们报告了来自奥地利、保加利亚、捷克共和国、匈牙利、波兰、罗马尼亚、斯洛伐克或斯洛文尼亚的至少 2 名肌肉骨骼患者的任何 EQ-5D 结果。使用 Cochrane 协作工具评估偏倚风险。纳入了 29 篇文章(5992 名患者),涉及类风湿关节炎(n=7)、骨质疏松症(n=5)、慢性疼痛(n=5)、骨关节炎(n=4)、强直性脊柱炎(n=2)、银屑病关节炎(n=2)、全髋关节置换术(n=2)和硬皮病(n=2)。下腰痛的研究相对较少,而颈部疼痛、系统性红斑狼疮、痛风和儿童疾病的研究则缺乏。24 项研究报告了 EQ-5D 指数得分,而分别有 41%和 46%的文章未具体说明工具的版本和价值集。对涉及 6876 个观察点的 24 种疾病状态进行了荟萃分析。22 个亚组报告了干预效果,其中 41%的亚组存在低偏倚风险。本综述提供了改善 EQ-5D 结果报告标准的建议,并强调了未来研究的潜在领域。针对具有最大公共卫生影响的疾病进行协调研究,并制定区域价值集,可以提供在该地区国家间可转移的、具有地方相关性的健康状态效用。