School of Physical Education, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011 Aug;33(4):527-47. doi: 10.1123/jsep.33.4.527.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether the relationships between contextual factors (i.e., autonomy-supportive vs. controlling coaching style) and person factors (i.e., autonomous vs. controlled motivation) outlined in self-determination theory (SDT) were related to prosocial and antisocial behaviors in sport. We also investigated moral disengagement as a mediator of these relationships. Athletes' (n = 292, M = 19.53 years) responses largely supported our SDT-derived hypotheses. Results indicated that an autonomy-supportive coaching style was associated with prosocial behavior toward teammates; this relationship was mediated by autonomous motivation. Controlled motivation was associated with antisocial behavior toward teammates and antisocial behavior toward opponents, and these two relationships were mediated by moral disengagement. The results provide support for research investigating the effect of autonomy-supportive coaching interventions on athletes' prosocial and antisocial behavior.
本研究旨在考察自我决定理论(SDT)中所概述的情境因素(即自主支持型 vs. 控制型指导风格)和个体因素(即自主型 vs. 控制型动机)与运动中的亲社会和反社会行为之间的关系。我们还研究了道德脱离作为这些关系的中介。运动员的(n = 292,M = 19.53 岁)反应在很大程度上支持了我们的 SDT 假设。结果表明,自主支持型的指导风格与运动员对队友的亲社会行为有关;这种关系是由自主动机介导的。控制型动机与运动员对队友和对手的反社会行为有关,这两个关系是由道德脱离介导的。研究结果为调查自主支持型教练干预对运动员亲社会和反社会行为的影响提供了支持。