Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912306.
The purpose of this study was to examine how coaching styles affect athletes' moral disengagement. To achieve our objectives, we examined the relationships among perceived coaching types, pride, and moral disengagement in the context of elite taekwondo athletes ( = 322). Direct and indirect effects among coaching types, pride, and moral disengagement were assessed through path analysis. The results indicated that the autonomy-support coaching type reduced moral disengagement by decreasing hubristic pride, while the controlled coaching type increased moral disengagement through hubristic pride. Our study found a chain of effects according to the controlled coaching type perceived by taekwondo athletes, hubristic pride, and moral disengagement; therefore, the controlled coaching type and hubristic pride should be closely managed in sport society, as they elicit greater moral disengagement. Managerial strategies to diminish hubristic pride through the autonomy-support coaching type are recommended.
本研究旨在探讨教练风格如何影响运动员的道德脱离。为了实现我们的目标,我们在精英跆拳道运动员的背景下考察了感知到的教练类型、自豪感和道德脱离之间的关系(n=322)。通过路径分析评估了教练类型、自豪感和道德脱离之间的直接和间接影响。结果表明,自主支持型教练风格通过降低自大的自豪感来减少道德脱离,而控制型教练风格则通过自大的自豪感来增加道德脱离。我们的研究发现,根据跆拳道运动员感知到的控制型教练风格、自大的自豪感和道德脱离,存在着一系列的影响;因此,在体育界应该密切管理控制型教练风格和自大的自豪感,因为它们会引起更大的道德脱离。建议通过自主支持型教练风格来减少自大的自豪感的管理策略。