Suppr超能文献

拉丁美洲的过敏反应:在线拉丁美洲过敏反应调查(OLASA)报告。

Anaphylaxis in Latin America: a report of the online Latin American survey on anaphylaxis (OLASA).

机构信息

Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(6):943-7. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000600004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the Online Latin American Survey of Anaphylaxis (OLASA) were to identify the main clinical manifestations, triggers, and treatments of severe allergic reactions in patients who were seen by allergists from July 2008 to June 2010 in 15 Latin American countries and Portugal (n =634).

RESULTS

Of all patients, 68.5% were older than 18 years, 41.6% were male, and 65.4% experienced the allergic reaction at home. The etiologic agent was identified in 87.4% of cases and predominantly consisted of drugs (31.2%), foods (23.3%), and insect stings (14.9%). The main symptom categories observed during the acute episodes were cutaneous (94.0%) and respiratory (79.0%). The majority of patients (71.6%) were treated initially by a physician (office/emergency room) within the first hour after the reaction occurred (60.2%), and 43.5% recovered in the first hour after treatment. Most patients were treated in an emergency setting, but only 37.3% received parenteral epinephrine alone or associated with other medication. However, 80.5% and 70.2% were treated with corticosteroids or antihistamines (alone or in association), respectively. A total of 12.9% of the patients underwent reanimation maneuvers, and 15.2% were hospitalized. Only 5.8% of the patients returned to the emergency room after discharge, with 21.7% returning in the first 6 hours after initial treatment.

CONCLUSION

The main clinical manifestations of severe allergic reactions were cutaneous. The etiologic agents that were identified as causing these acute episodes differed according to age group. Following in order: drugs (31.2%), foods (23.3% and insect stings (14.9%) in adults with foods predominance in children. Treatment provided for acute anaphylactic reactions was not appropriate. It is necessary to improve educational programs in order to enhance the knowledge on this potentially fatal emergency.

摘要

目的

在线拉丁美洲过敏反应调查(OLASA)的目的是确定在 2008 年 7 月至 2010 年 6 月期间,15 个拉丁美洲国家和葡萄牙的过敏专家诊治的 634 例严重过敏反应患者的主要临床表现、触发因素和治疗方法。

结果

所有患者中,68.5%年龄大于 18 岁,41.6%为男性,65.4%在家中发生过敏反应。87.4%的病例确定了病因,主要为药物(31.2%)、食物(23.3%)和昆虫叮咬(14.9%)。急性发作期间观察到的主要症状类别为皮肤(94.0%)和呼吸(79.0%)。大多数患者(71.6%)在反应发生后 1 小时内由医生(诊室/急诊室)首次治疗(60.2%),43.5%在治疗后 1 小时内恢复。大多数患者在急诊环境中接受治疗,但只有 37.3%单独或联合使用肾上腺素。然而,80.5%和 70.2%分别接受了皮质类固醇或抗组胺药(单独或联合)治疗。共有 12.9%的患者接受了复苏操作,15.2%住院。只有 5.8%的患者出院后返回急诊室,21.7%在初始治疗后 6 小时内返回。

结论

严重过敏反应的主要临床表现为皮肤。引起这些急性发作的病因因年龄组而异。依次为:药物(31.2%)、食物(23.3%)和昆虫叮咬(14.9%),在成人中以食物为主,在儿童中以食物为主。急性过敏反应的治疗方法不合适。有必要改进教育计划,以提高对这种潜在致命紧急情况的认识。

相似文献

4
5
Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in Latin American Countries.药物诱导性过敏反应在拉丁美洲国家的发生情况。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Sep-Oct;3(5):780-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Clinical Characteristics of Allergy to Hymenoptera Stings.膜翅目昆虫叮咬过敏的临床特征
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Sep;35(9):600-604. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001200.
7
An Internet-based survey of anaphylactic reactions to foods.
Allergy. 2001 Jun;56(6):540-3. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.056006540.x.
10
Multinational experience with hypersensitivity drug reactions in Latin America.拉丁美洲药物过敏反应的跨国经验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Sep;113(3):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Latin American anaphylaxis registry.拉丁美洲过敏反应登记处。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Feb 5;16(2):100748. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100748. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Knowledge of healthcare providers in the management of anaphylaxis.医疗服务提供者在过敏反应管理方面的知识。
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Nov 9;14(11):100599. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100599. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
5
Challenges of managing food allergy in the developing world.发展中世界食物过敏管理面临的挑战。
World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Dec 2;12(11):100089. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100089. eCollection 2019 Nov.
6
Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: an Update.食物诱导性过敏反应:最新进展。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018 Jun 14;18(8):41. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0795-5.
10
Why a registry of Chronic Urticaria (CUR) is needed.为什么需要慢性荨麻疹(CUR)登记册。
World Allergy Organ J. 2017 May 16;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40413-017-0147-2. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Anaphylaxis: past, present and future.过敏反应:过去、现在和未来。
Allergy. 2011 Jan;66(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02422.x.
3
Epinephrine (adrenaline) in anaphylaxis.肾上腺素在过敏反应中的应用。
Chem Immunol Allergy. 2010;95:211-222. doi: 10.1159/000315954. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
4
Anaphylaxis.过敏反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S161-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.981.
7
Anaphylaxis: Recent advances in assessment and treatment.过敏反应:评估与治疗的最新进展
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Oct;124(4):625-36; quiz 637-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.08.025.
8
Epidemiology of anaphylaxis.过敏反应的流行病学。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;9(4):351-6. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32832db95a.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验