Iynen Ismail, Bozkus Ferhat, San Imran, Alatas Necat
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harran University, Hospital, 63300 Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Oct;75(10):1292-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
To evaluate the efficacy of Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) in the control of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding in adenoidectomy.
In total, 90 patients underwent traditional cold steel adenoidectomy and were then randomized to receive ABS or 0.9% physiological saline solution to obtain hemostasis. Objective data collected included time of operation and blood loss during operation. Visual analog scales (VAS) were used to record subjective data by the operating surgeon including bleeding following adenoid pack removal and ease of operation.
In a comparison between patients in the ABS group (n = 46) and the control group (n = 44), those in the ABS group had significantly shorter operation times (9.11 ± 1.02 vs. 13.16 ± 3.96 min; p < 0.001) and less blood loss during the operation (20.19 ± 8.59 vs. 25.48 ± 12.96 ml; p ≤ 0.05) and a shorter hemostasis time (3.83 ± 0.8 vs. 5.82 ± 1.67 min; p < 0.001). Regarding hemorrhage after tampon removal, 40 patients (87%) in the ABS group and 17 patients (38.6%) in the control group did not suffer from hemorrhage (p < 0.001). Regarding ease of hemostasis, 40 patients (87%) in the ABS group experienced very easy or easy hemostasis while 26 patients in the control group did so (59.1%; p = 0.004). Patients in the ABS group returned to a regular diet earlier and had less use of analgesics at 7 days postoperatively. Use of electrocautery was less in the ABS group than in the control group (10.9 vs. 40.9%; p = 0.001).
The side on which ABS was used showed significant differences in hemostasis time, blood loss, and ease of hemostasis. ABS appears to be safe and effective; it decreases intraoperative bleeding and reduces operating time when compared to traditional hemostasis methods after curette adenoidectomy.
评估安卡福得止血剂(ABS)在腺样体切除术中及术后控制出血的疗效。
总共90例患者接受了传统的冷钢腺样体切除术,然后随机分为接受ABS或0.9%生理盐水溶液以实现止血。收集的客观数据包括手术时间和术中失血量。视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于记录主刀医生的主观数据,包括腺样体填塞物取出后的出血情况和手术的难易程度。
在ABS组(n = 46)和对照组(n = 44)患者的比较中,ABS组患者的手术时间明显更短(9.11 ± 1.02对13.16 ± 3.96分钟;p < 0.001),术中失血量更少(20.19 ± 8.59对25.48 ± 12.96毫升;p ≤ 0.05),止血时间更短(3.83 ± 0.8对5.82 ± 1.67分钟;p < 0.001)。关于填塞物取出后的出血情况,ABS组40例患者(87%)和对照组17例患者(38.6%)未发生出血(p < 0.001)。关于止血的难易程度,ABS组40例患者(87%)的止血非常容易或容易,而对照组有26例患者(59.1%)如此(p = 0.004)。ABS组患者更早恢复正常饮食,术后7天使用镇痛药的情况更少。ABS组使用电灼的情况比对照组少(10.9%对40.9%;p = 0.001)。
使用ABS的一侧在止血时间、失血量和止血难易程度方面显示出显著差异。ABS似乎是安全有效的;与刮除腺样体切除术后的传统止血方法相比,它可减少术中出血并缩短手术时间。