School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, Claremont Graduate University, USA.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jan;67(1):36-42. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr071. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
The goal of this study was to compare the extent to which young and older adults exhibit flexibility in adjusting decision criteria in response to changes in recognition task difficulty.
Forty-eight young and 48 older adults studied a list of word pairs and then took 2 successive tests of associative recognition, an easy test consisting of intact study pairs and new lure pairs and a hard test pitting intact study pairs against rearranged lures. The order of the 2 tests was manipulated, with half of the participants in each age group receiving the easy test first and half receiving the hard test first.
When the easy test preceded the hard test, participants in both age groups adopted a more stringent response criterion on the harder test. When the hard test preceded the easy test, no criterion shift was seen in either age group.
These results suggest that older adults have preserved metacognitive abilities with regard to assessing the consequences for accuracy of maintaining a lenient criterion when discrimination between experienced and new information becomes more difficult and further suggests that they can take appropriate action to control error rates under these conditions.
本研究旨在比较年轻人和老年人在根据识别任务难度的变化调整决策标准的灵活性方面的程度。
48 名年轻参与者和 48 名老年参与者学习了一组单词对,然后进行了 2 项连续的联想识别测试,一项简单的测试包括完整的学习对和新的诱饵对,另一项困难的测试则将完整的学习对与重新排列的诱饵对进行比较。2 项测试的顺序是随机的,每组中有一半的参与者先进行简单的测试,另一半先进行困难的测试。
当简单的测试先于困难的测试时,两个年龄组的参与者在更难的测试中采用了更严格的反应标准。当困难的测试先于简单的测试时,两个年龄组都没有看到标准的转变。
这些结果表明,老年人在评估在经验信息和新信息之间的区分变得更加困难时保持宽松标准对准确性的后果方面保持了元认知能力,进一步表明他们可以在这些条件下采取适当的行动来控制错误率。