Longo Umile Giuseppe, Berton Alessandra, Ahrens Philip Michael, Maffulli Nicola, Denaro Vincenzo
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Trigoria, Rome, Italy.
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011 Sep;19(3):266-78. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3182250c8b.
Several tests have been described to examine the shoulder. However, there is a lack of consensus on clinical assessment of patients with shoulder pain and suspected rotator cuff pathology. This review reports the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for rotator cuff pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 21 clinical tests for rotator cuff pathology are reported from the available literature. Twenty studies investigated supraspinatus pathology, 12 infraspinatus pathology, and 9 subscapularis pathology. Most tests for rotator cuff pathology are inaccurate, and the recent literature shows that there is insufficient evidence to recommend 1 clinical test over another for diagnosis of rotator cuff pathology. Poor diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for rotator cuff pathology may be related to the close relationships of structures in the shoulder, to a lack of understanding of anatomical basis of the tests, or to their lack of reproducibility.
已经描述了几种用于检查肩部的测试。然而,对于肩痛和疑似肩袖病理的患者的临床评估缺乏共识。本综述报告了肩袖病理临床测试的诊断准确性。从现有文献中报告了21种肩袖病理临床测试的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。20项研究调查了冈上肌病理,12项研究了冈下肌病理,9项研究了肩胛下肌病理。大多数肩袖病理测试不准确,最近的文献表明,没有足够的证据推荐一种临床测试优于另一种用于诊断肩袖病理。肩袖病理临床测试的诊断准确性差可能与肩部结构的密切关系、对测试解剖学基础的缺乏理解或缺乏可重复性有关。