• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体在不同时间和刺激类型下对正性图像的显性注意偏好存在差异。

Individuals vary in their overt attention preference for positive images consistently across time and stimulus types.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(1):8712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58987-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-58987-8
PMID:38622243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11018868/
Abstract

What humans look at strongly determines what they see. We show that individual differences in the tendency to look at positive stimuli are stable across time and across contents, establishing gaze positivity preference as a perceptual trait that determines the amount of positively valence stimuli individuals select for visual processing. Furthermore, we show that patients with major depressive disorder exhibit consistently low positivity preference before treatment. In a subset of patients, we also assessed the positivity preference after two months of treatment in which positivity gaze preference increased to levels similar to healthy individuals. We discuss the possible practical diagnostic applications of these findings, as well as how this general gaze-related trait may influence other behavioral and psychological aspects.

摘要

人看什么决定了人能看到什么。我们证明,对积极刺激的注视倾向的个体差异在时间和内容上都是稳定的,这就确立了注视正性偏好作为一种感知特质,它决定了个体选择进行视觉处理的积极效价刺激的数量。此外,我们还表明,重度抑郁症患者在治疗前表现出一致的低正性偏好。在患者的一个亚组中,我们还评估了治疗两个月后的正性偏好,此时正性注视偏好增加到与健康个体相似的水平。我们讨论了这些发现可能的实际诊断应用,以及这种普遍的与注视相关的特质如何影响其他行为和心理方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/2a0133ab101d/41598_2024_58987_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/ccf27a56c6eb/41598_2024_58987_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/13a508a91f46/41598_2024_58987_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/249728ebdfba/41598_2024_58987_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/2f4a6789d451/41598_2024_58987_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/bf4b6fe22353/41598_2024_58987_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/2a0133ab101d/41598_2024_58987_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/ccf27a56c6eb/41598_2024_58987_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/13a508a91f46/41598_2024_58987_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/249728ebdfba/41598_2024_58987_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/2f4a6789d451/41598_2024_58987_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/bf4b6fe22353/41598_2024_58987_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc3b/11018868/2a0133ab101d/41598_2024_58987_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Individuals vary in their overt attention preference for positive images consistently across time and stimulus types.个体在不同时间和刺激类型下对正性图像的显性注意偏好存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(1):8712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58987-8.
2
The relationship between dispositional attention to feelings and visual attention to emotion.特质性情绪注意与情绪视觉注意的关系。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 8;100:109882. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109882. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
3
Efficient visual search for facial emotions in patients with major depression.高效地对重性抑郁障碍患者的面部情绪进行视觉搜索。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 11;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03093-6.
4
Gauging facial feature viewing preference as a stable individual trait in autism spectrum disorder.评估自闭症谱系障碍个体对面部特征的观看偏好。
Autism Res. 2021 Aug;14(8):1670-1683. doi: 10.1002/aur.2540. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Reduced medial prefrontal responses to social interaction images in remitted depression.缓解期抑郁症患者内侧前额叶对社交互动图像的反应减弱。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;69(1):37-45. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.139.
6
The robustness of individual differences in gaze preferences toward faces and eyes across face-to-face experimental designs and its relation to social anxiety.个体在面对面实验设计中对视和眼神的偏好差异的稳健性及其与社交焦虑的关系。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.15.
7
A novel perceptual trait: gaze predilection for faces during visual exploration.一种新颖的知觉特征:在视觉探索过程中,目光偏爱人脸。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 24;9(1):10714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47110-x.
8
Eye Preference for Emotional Stimuli in Sichuan Snub-Nosed Monkeys.四川短鼻猴对情绪刺激的眼偏好。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2020;91(6):630-642. doi: 10.1159/000509442. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
9
Characterization of performance on an automated visual recognition memory task in 7.5-month-old infants.7.5 个月大婴儿在自动化视觉识别记忆任务中的表现特征。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2020 Sep-Oct;81:106904. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2020.106904. Epub 2020 May 30.
10
A constellation of eye-tracking measures reveals social attention differences in ASD and the broad autism phenotype.一系列的眼动追踪测量结果揭示了 ASD 和广泛自闭症表型中的社会注意力差异。
Mol Autism. 2022 May 4;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00490-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention to facial emotions in adult women varies by type and severity of childhood maltreatment experience and emotion regulation strategy.成年女性对面部情绪的关注因童年虐待经历的类型和严重程度以及情绪调节策略而异。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 9;15(1):16266. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99562-z.
2
Reduced positive attentional bias in patients with borderline personality disorder compared with non-patients: results from a free-viewing eye-tracking study.边缘型人格障碍患者与非患者相比,积极注意偏向降低:一项自由观看眼动追踪研究的结果
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2024 Sep 16;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40479-024-00267-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the 'mood congruency' hypothesis of attention allocation - An eye-tracking study.探索注意力分配的“情绪一致性”假说——一项眼动研究。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Feb 15;347:619-629. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.12.004. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
State-dependent alterations of implicit emotional dominance during binocular rivalry in subthreshold depression.阈下抑郁患者在双眼竞争中内隐情绪优势的状态依赖性改变。
Psych J. 2023 Dec;12(6):809-823. doi: 10.1002/pchj.686. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
3
Do we know our visual preferences?我们了解自己的视觉偏好吗?
J Vis. 2023 Feb 1;23(2):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.2.9.
4
Lower recognition thresholds for sad facial expressions in subthreshold depression: a longitudinal study.阈下抑郁患者对悲伤面部表情的识别阈限降低:一项纵向研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Dec;294:113499. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113499. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Attentional biases to emotional information in clinical depression: A systematic and meta-analytic review of eye tracking findings.临床抑郁症患者对情绪信息的注意偏差:眼动追踪研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:632-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.140. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.毕竟它还是出现了:点探测任务中对笑脸的注意偏向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2463-2481. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02017-y.
7
Understanding positive emotion deficits in depression: From emotion preferences to emotion regulation.理解抑郁症中的积极情绪缺陷:从情绪偏好到情绪调节。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;76:101826. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101826. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
8
A novel perceptual trait: gaze predilection for faces during visual exploration.一种新颖的知觉特征:在视觉探索过程中,目光偏爱人脸。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 24;9(1):10714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47110-x.
9
Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions.个体间在视觉显著性上的差异会沿着语义维度发生变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 11;116(24):11687-11692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820553116. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Causal processes in psychology are heterogeneous.心理学中的因果过程是异质的。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Apr;148(4):601-618. doi: 10.1037/xge0000558.