Department of Orthopaedics, Centre hospitalier Bienne, Vogelsang 84, 2500 Bienne, Switzerland.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Mar;470(3):883-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1998-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
The transfemoral approach is an extensile surgical approach that is performed routinely to facilitate cement and implant removal and improve exposure for revision stem implantation. Previous studies have looked at clinical results of small patient groups. The factors associated with fixation failure of cementless revision stems when using this approach have not been examined.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) the clinical results and (2) complications of the transfemoral approach and (3) factors associated with fixation failure of revision stems when using the transfemoral approach.
We retrospectively examined all our patients in whom femoral stem revision was performed through a transfemoral approach between December 1998 and April 2004 and for whom a minimal followup of 2 years was available. One hundred patients were available for this study. The mean (± SD) postoperative followup was 5 years (± 1.64 years).
The average Harris hip score improved from 45.2 (± 14.02) preoperatively to 83.4 (± 11.86) at final followup. Complete radiographic bony consolidation of the osteotomy site was observed in 95% of patients. Dislocations occurred in 9% of patients. Four revision stem fixation failures were observed, all occurring in patients with primary three-point fixation. Three-point fixation was associated with short osteotomy flaps and long revision stems.
The transfemoral approach is associated with a high rate of osteotomy flap bony healing and good clinical results. When using the transfemoral approach, a long osteotomy flap should be performed and the shortest possible revision stem should be implanted.
Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
经股入路是一种广泛应用的外科入路,常用于方便水泥和植入物的取出,并改善翻修柄植入的暴露。先前的研究着眼于小患者群体的临床结果。在使用该入路时,与非骨水泥翻修柄固定失败相关的因素尚未得到研究。
问题/目的:我们旨在:(1) 确定经股入路的临床结果和并发症;(2) 当使用经股入路时,评估与翻修柄固定失败相关的因素。
我们回顾性研究了 1998 年 12 月至 2004 年 4 月期间通过经股入路进行股骨柄翻修的所有患者,并且这些患者均获得了至少 2 年的随访。本研究共纳入 100 例患者。平均(±SD)术后随访时间为 5 年(±1.64 年)。
平均 Harris 髋关节评分从术前的 45.2(±14.02)改善至末次随访时的 83.4(±11.86)。95%的患者观察到截骨部位完全影像学骨愈合。9%的患者发生脱位。4 例翻修柄固定失败,均发生于初次三点固定的患者。三点固定与短截骨瓣和长翻修柄相关。
经股入路与较高的截骨瓣骨愈合率和良好的临床结果相关。使用经股入路时,应行较长的截骨瓣,并植入尽可能短的翻修柄。
IV 级,治疗性研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。