Suppr超能文献

一项比较慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者连续超声和脉冲超声治疗效果的随机、双盲临床试验。

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the effects of continuous and pulsed ultrasound in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

机构信息

Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

出版信息

Physiother Theory Pract. 2012 Feb;28(2):85-94. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.571751. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of continuous ultrasound (CUS) with pulsed ultrasound (PUS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, 40 patients (10 losses) with CRS participated. Patients received either continuous or pulsed (1:9) 1 MHz ultrasound (US) using a US head of 1 cm2 at 1 W/cm2 and 0.5 W/cm2 for the maxillary and frontal sinuses, respectively. Treatment was performed in 10 sessions, 3 days per week, with US given every other day. The primary outcome measure was percent improvement in the Sinusitis Symptom Score. Measurements were taken before and after 10 treatment sessions. The patients were followed up monthly for 2 months. After treatment, both groups improved significantly on the Sinusitis Symptoms Score. Patients who received PUS had significantly decreased total symptom scores compared with patients receiving CUS (mean change 9.8 vs. 5.6, p = 0.049). The percent improvement in the Sinusitis Symptom Score between the PUS group (65.2 SD 23.1) and the CUS group (43.9 SD 40.7) was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). The effect size for each treatment was large; PUS: d = 3.92 and CUS: d = 1.93. Symptom improvement in both groups was similar at the 2-month follow-up. These results support the use of therapeutic US for CRS. This pilot study gives only marginal evidence to favor PUS over CUS.

摘要

本研究旨在比较慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)患者连续超声(CUS)与脉冲超声(PUS)的疗效。这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组研究,共纳入 40 例(10 例脱落)CRS 患者。患者分别接受连续或脉冲(1:9)1MHz 超声(US)治疗,声头面积为 1cm²,强度分别为 1W/cm²和 0.5W/cm²,用于上颌窦和额窦。治疗共 10 次,每周 3 天,隔日进行。主要结局指标为窦炎症状评分的改善百分比。在 10 次治疗前后进行测量。患者在治疗后 2 个月内每月随访。治疗后,两组患者的窦炎症状评分均显著改善。与接受 CUS 的患者相比,接受 PUS 的患者总症状评分显著降低(平均变化 9.8 比 5.6,p=0.049)。PUS 组(65.2±23.1)和 CUS 组(43.9±40.7)的窦炎症状评分改善百分比差异无统计学意义(p=0.09)。两种治疗方法的治疗效果均较大;PUS:d=3.92,CUS:d=1.93。两组在 2 个月随访时的症状改善情况相似。这些结果支持使用治疗性 US 治疗 CRS。本研究仅提供了微弱的证据支持 PUS 优于 CUS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验