• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Colles 骨折患者的测量可靠性和有效性以及残疾与行为因素之间的关系。

Reliability and validity of measurement and associations between disability and behavioural factors in patients with Colles' fracture.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy Södertull, Primary Care, Gävle, Centre for Research & Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gävleborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Physiother Theory Pract. 2012 Apr;28(3):188-97. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.583174. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

DOI:10.3109/09593985.2011.583174
PMID:21823992
Abstract

The aims of the study were to 1) investigate the test-retest reliability, the internal consistency in instruments that measure behavioural factors and disability as well as to investigate convergent validity between the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome Questionnaire (DASH) and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), in patients with Colles' fracture; and 2) assess the relationship between the behavioural measures and the region-specific measures addressing the patient perceptions of impairment, functional loss, and disability. Two samples (sample 1 = 16; sample 2 = 16) of patients with the fracture immobilised in plaster cast were included. The participants answered the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome Questionnaire (DASH), Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK), Catastrophizing Subscale (CAT) of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), and Self-Efficacy Scale (SES) twice. Test-retest reliability was satisfactory for all instruments. The internal consistency examined with Cronbach's alpha was between 0.68 and 0.97. Because acceptable to good test-retest reliability and internal consistency were demonstrated for the PRWE, DASH, TSK, CAT of the CSQ, and SES, they can be used to detect and monitor fear of movement/(re)injury, catastrophic cognitions, and self-efficacy in patients with radius fracture in the acute and subacute phase. Generally low to moderate correlations were found between behavioural and region-specific measures, indicating that there are two distinct concepts that are not interchangeable.

摘要

本研究的目的是

1)探讨测量行为因素和残疾的工具的重测信度、内部一致性以及探讨腕关节骨折患者的 Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome Questionnaire (DASH) 和 Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) 之间的聚合效度;2)评估行为测量与针对患者感知损伤、功能丧失和残疾的区域特异性测量之间的关系。两个样本(样本 1=16;样本 2=16)的骨折患者均用石膏固定。参与者两次回答了 Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)、Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome Questionnaire (DASH)、Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK)、Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) 的 Catastrophizing 亚量表 (CAT) 和 Self-Efficacy Scale (SES)。所有仪器的重测信度均令人满意。用 Cronbach's alpha 检验的内部一致性在 0.68 到 0.97 之间。由于 PRWE、DASH、TSK、CSQ 的 CAT 和 SES 均表现出可接受至良好的重测信度和内部一致性,因此它们可用于检测和监测急性和亚急性阶段桡骨骨折患者对运动/(再)受伤的恐惧、灾难性认知和自我效能。行为和区域特异性测量之间的相关性通常较低,表明存在两个不同的概念,不能互换。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of measurement and associations between disability and behavioural factors in patients with Colles' fracture.Colles 骨折患者的测量可靠性和有效性以及残疾与行为因素之间的关系。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2012 Apr;28(3):188-97. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.583174. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
2
Reliability and validity of the German version of "the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)" as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures.德文版“患者自评腕关节评估(PRWE)”作为急性桡骨远端骨折患者腕部疼痛和功能障碍的疗效指标的可靠性和有效性。
J Hand Ther. 2008 Oct-Dec;21(4):366-76. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
3
[Reliability and validity of the upper limb DASH questionnaire in patients with distal radius fractures].[桡骨远端骨折患者上肢DASH问卷的信效度研究]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002 Jul-Aug;140(4):447-51. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33396.
4
Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation.患者自评腕关节评估量表的韩文版评估。
J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):238-43; quiz 244. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
5
Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE-Hong Kong Version).患者自评腕关节评估问卷中文版(香港版)的结构效度。
J Hand Ther. 2006 Jan-Mar;19(1):18-26, quiz 27. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.10.003.
6
DASH questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms in industry workers: a validity and reliability study.用于分析产业工人肌肉骨骼症状的DASH问卷:一项效度和信度研究。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Mar;40(2):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
7
Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius.对瑞典语版患者自评腕关节评估结果问卷的评估:在99例桡骨远端骨折康复患者中具有良好的反应性、效度和信度。
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(2):94-101. doi: 10.1080/02844310902734598.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Hindi version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation.患者自评腕关节评估量表印地语版的跨文化调适与心理计量学测试。
J Hand Ther. 2012 Jan-Mar;25(1):65-77; quiz 78. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
9
Validation of a German version of the 'Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand' questionnaire (DASH-G).《手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍》问卷德文版(DASH-G)的验证
Z Rheumatol. 2003 Apr;62(2):168-77. doi: 10.1007/s00393-003-0461-7.
10
The Spanish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation outcome measure: cross-cultural adaptation process, reliability, measurement error and construct validity.患者自评腕关节评估结果测量工具的西班牙语版本:跨文化调适过程、信度、测量误差与结构效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 24;15(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0745-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcomes measures used to assess upper limb pathology: a systematic review.用于评估上肢病理的患者报告结局测量的心理测量学特性:系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Dec;92(12):3170-3175. doi: 10.1111/ans.17973. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
2
Validity, reliability, and calibration of the physical activity unit 7 item screener (PAU-7S) at population scale.在人群中评估身体活动单位 7 项筛查器(PAU-7S)的有效性、可靠性和校准。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jul 17;18(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01169-w.
3
Early post-immobilization pain at rest, movement evoked pain, and their ratio as potential predictors of pain and disability at six- and 12-months after distal radius fracture.
固定后早期静息痛、活动诱发痛及其比值作为桡骨远端骨折后6个月和12个月疼痛及功能障碍的潜在预测指标。
Arch Physiother. 2021 Mar 1;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00101-6.
4
Comparison of SCAphoid fracture osteosynthesis by MAGnesium-based headless Herbert screws with titanium Herbert screws: protocol for the randomized controlled SCAMAG clinical trial.比较 MAG 无头 Herbert 螺钉与钛 Herbert 螺钉治疗舟状骨骨折的骨内固定术:SCAMAG 临床试验的随机对照方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Aug 7;20(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2723-9.
5
Is Use of a Psychological Workbook Associated With Improved Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scores in Patients With Distal Radius Fracture?使用心理手册是否与桡骨远端骨折患者手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍评分的改善相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):832-845. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000095.
6
Are the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire used in distal radial fractures truly valid and reliable?用于桡骨远端骨折的患者自评腕关节评估(PRWE)和上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷是否真的有效且可靠?
Bone Joint Res. 2018 Jan;7(1):36-45. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0081.R1.
7
Minimal important change and other measurement properties of the Oxford Elbow Score and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand in patients with a simple elbow dislocation; validation study alongside the multicenter FuncSiE trial.单纯肘关节脱位患者牛津肘关节评分和手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评定量表的最小重要变化及其他测量属性;与多中心FuncSiE试验同步进行的验证研究
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0182557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182557. eCollection 2017.
8
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hand and Wrist Trauma: Is There Sufficient Evidence of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness?手部和腕部创伤的患者报告结局指标:是否有足够的可靠性、有效性和反应性证据?
Hand (N Y). 2016 Mar;11(1):11-21. doi: 10.1177/1558944715614855. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
9
Are validated outcome measures used in distal radial fractures truly valid? A critical assessment using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.用于桡骨远端骨折的经过验证的结局指标真的有效吗?使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的批判性评估。
Bone Joint Res. 2016 Apr;5(4):153-61. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000462.