Suppr超能文献

脉搏波作为门控心肌灌注 SPECT 成像中数据同步的替代信号。

Pulse wave as an alternate signal for data synchronization during gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charles University, Third Medical Faculty, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Clin Nucl Med. 2011 Sep;36(9):762-6. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318217aec5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Proper identification of the cardiac cycle is essential for gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. We have developed an alternate method of ECG for gating, that is, using the peripheral pulse wave (PW) as the triggering signal for gated SPECT acquisition. The aim of this study is to compare the use of this method of gating with the standard ECG trigger.

METHODS

We tested the PW triggering by comparing it with the ECG trigger. We evaluated 33 patients (25 males, 8 females), average age of 61 years (39-80) referred for stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Data from all patients were acquired twice and were processed by CEqual and QGS software. We compared the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV). Paired t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for comparison.

RESULTS

The mean LVEF, EDV, and ESV calculated with the ECG trigger were 0.52, 120, and 64, respectively, those with the pulse-wave trigger were 0.48, 126, and 71, respectively. Mean paired difference for LVEF was -0.034 (P<0.001), for EDV 5.9 (P=0.012), and for ESV 7.9 (P<0.001). Pearson correlation coefficient for LVEF was 0.955, for EDV 0.987, and for ESV 0.991 (P<0.001 for all correlations).

CONCLUSION

Triggering of gated-data acquisition by the PW is feasible. Quantitative parameters of cardiac function correlate highly with those obtained from the ECG trigger and the absolute differences are not clinically significant across a wide range of values.

摘要

目的

门控 SPECT 心肌灌注成像中正确识别心动周期至关重要。我们开发了一种替代心电图(ECG)门控的方法,即使用外周脉搏波(PW)作为门控 SPECT 采集的触发信号。本研究旨在比较该门控方法与标准 ECG 触发的使用。

方法

我们通过将 PW 触发与 ECG 触发进行比较来测试 PW 触发。我们评估了 33 名(25 名男性,8 名女性)患者,平均年龄 61 岁(39-80 岁),因应激心肌灌注成像而就诊。所有患者的数据均采集两次,并由 CEqual 和 QGS 软件进行处理。我们比较了左心室射血分数(LVEF)、舒张末期和收缩末期容积(EDV、ESV)。使用配对 t 检验和 Pearson 相关系数进行比较。

结果

使用 ECG 触发计算的平均 LVEF、EDV 和 ESV 分别为 0.52、120 和 64,使用脉搏波触发计算的平均 LVEF、EDV 和 ESV 分别为 0.48、126 和 71。LVEF 的平均配对差异为-0.034(P<0.001),EDV 为 5.9(P=0.012),ESV 为 7.9(P<0.001)。LVEF 的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.955,EDV 为 0.987,ESV 为 0.991(所有相关性的 P<0.001)。

结论

PW 触发门控数据采集是可行的。心脏功能的定量参数与 ECG 触发获得的参数高度相关,并且在广泛的数值范围内,绝对差异在临床上并不显著。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验