GB Pant Hospital & Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi University, New Delhi, India.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Oct;15(10):1829-36. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1649-9. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
Hydatid disease of the liver is endemic in India and is a common health problem. Although various treatment options have been described ranging from pharmacotherapy to radiological interventions and surgical procedures (both conservative and radical), the best treatment option in an individual case continues to be debated.
We did a retrospective analysis of patients with hydatid disease of the liver who were managed at our centre between January 2000 and December 2009. All cysts were classified as per the Gharbi's classification. The various treatment options used to treat hydatid cysts of the liver included percutaneous aspiration, injection and reaspiration (PAIR) or PAIR with drainage (PAIR-D) and surgery (both conservative and radical). The immediate and long-term outcomes following such management were analysed.
During the study period, 128 patients with hydatid cyst of the liver were managed with PAIR/PAIR-D (n = 52), radical/excisional surgery (n = 61) and conservative surgery (n = 33). In ten patients, the PAIR procedure was abandoned due to either bile or pultaceous material aspirated after the initial puncture and these patients subsequently underwent surgical management. The PAIR was unsuccessful in eight of the 42 patients in whom it was attempted and these subsequently underwent surgery. The mean intraoperative blood loss and the duration of surgery were comparable in patients who underwent either conservative or radical surgery (p = 0.35 and 0.19, respectively). Postoperative bile leaks and cavity abscesses were significantly higher in patients who underwent conservative surgery (p = 0.032 and p = 0.001, respectively). Five patients (one following a radical operation and four following a conservative surgery, p = 0.05) developed recurrence in a mean follow-up period of 28 months and these were managed medically.
Several treatment options are available for the management of hydatid disease of the liver and the treatment modality chosen should be tailored to the individual patient. While percutaneous drainage (with PAIR/PAIR-D) is reserved for more favourable cases of type I and II cysts, the others are best managed surgically. Complete excision (cystopericstectomy or resection) of the hydatid cyst is the preferred approach and 61 of the 94 patients who were managed surgically were suitable for it. Although excisional surgery minimizes the risk of long-term recurrence and cavity-related complications, it may be hazardous in cysts located close to major biliovascular channels. In these cases (considering that it is benign disease), a drainage operation is preferable. Both conservative and radical surgery can be safely performed laparoscopically.
肝包虫病在印度流行,是一个常见的健康问题。尽管已经描述了各种治疗选择,包括药物治疗、放射介入和手术(保守和激进),但在个别病例中,最佳治疗选择仍存在争议。
我们对 2000 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月在我们中心治疗的肝包虫病患者进行了回顾性分析。所有囊肿均按 Gharbi 分类进行分类。用于治疗肝包虫囊肿的各种治疗选择包括经皮抽吸、注射和再抽吸(PAIR)或 PAIR 加引流(PAIR-D)和手术(保守和激进)。分析了这种治疗后的即刻和长期结果。
在研究期间,52 例患者接受 PAIR/PAIR-D 治疗(n=52),61 例患者接受根治性/切除术治疗(n=61),33 例患者接受保守性手术治疗。在最初穿刺后抽吸到胆汁或糊状物质的 10 例患者中,放弃了 PAIR 治疗,这些患者随后接受了手术治疗。在尝试 PAIR 的 42 例患者中,有 8 例治疗失败,随后进行了手术。行保守或根治性手术的患者术中出血量和手术时间无差异(p=0.35 和 0.19)。行保守性手术的患者术后胆漏和脓肿的发生率明显高于行根治性手术的患者(p=0.032 和 p=0.001)。5 例患者(1 例根治术后,4 例保守术后,p=0.05)在平均 28 个月的随访期间出现复发,这些患者均接受了药物治疗。
肝包虫病有多种治疗选择,治疗方式应根据患者个体情况而定。经皮引流(PAIR/PAIR-D)适用于 I 型和 II 型囊肿等更有利的病例,其他病例最好手术治疗。完整切除(囊壁切除术或肝叶切除术)是首选方法,94 例手术治疗的患者中有 61 例适合该方法。虽然根治性手术可最大程度降低长期复发和与腔相关的并发症风险,但对于靠近主要肝胆管的囊肿可能存在危险。在这些情况下(考虑到这是一种良性疾病),引流手术是更好的选择。保守性和根治性手术均可安全地进行腹腔镜手术。