Department of Cardiovascular and Neurologic Diseases, College of Oriental Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Chin J Integr Med. 2011 Aug;17(8):575-9. doi: 10.1007/s11655-011-0811-2. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
Moxibustion is currently used for treating diabetes mellitus (DM) as a non-drug intervention in East Asian countries. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of moxibustion for managing the symptoms of type 2 DM patients.
We searched MEDLINE, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, six Korean databases, and four Chinese databases. Risk of bias was used for evaluating the quality of the included studies.
A total of 5 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. All of the included studies had high risks of bias. One randomized clinical trial (RCT) compared the effectiveness of one-time moxibustion use with oral administration of glibenclimide and showed the significant effects of moxibustion on glycemic control. Another RCT tested the effectiveness of moxibustion plus conventional treatment, and the moxibustion group reported significant improvement in fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels compared with the conventional treatment group. Two RCTs compared the effectiveness of moxibustion versus acupuncture or moxibustion plus acupuncture, and the combined treatment showed the most favorable effects on the control of blood glucose, urine glucose, and glycocylated hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)). One uncontrolled observational study showed favorable effects of moxibustion on the response rate.
It is difficult to conclude that moxibustion is an effective intervention for the control of type 2 DM due to the scarcity of trials and the low methodological quality of included studies. Further rigorous RCTs may be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of moxibustion for type 2 DM.
艾灸目前在东亚国家被用作治疗糖尿病(DM)的非药物干预措施。本系统评价旨在评估艾灸治疗 2 型糖尿病患者症状的疗效。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、AMED、EMBASE、CINAHL、The Cochrane Library、6 个韩国数据库和 4 个中文数据库。使用偏倚风险评估纳入研究的质量。
共有 5 项研究符合本综述的纳入标准。所有纳入的研究都存在较高的偏倚风险。一项随机临床试验(RCT)比较了一次性艾灸使用与格列本脲口服治疗的效果,显示艾灸对血糖控制有显著效果。另一项 RCT 测试了艾灸加常规治疗的效果,艾灸组的空腹和餐后血糖水平与常规治疗组相比有显著改善。两项 RCT 比较了艾灸与针灸或艾灸加针灸的效果,联合治疗对血糖、尿糖和糖化血红蛋白 A(1c)(HbA(1c))的控制效果最佳。一项非对照观察性研究表明艾灸对反应率有良好的效果。
由于试验数量少且纳入研究的方法学质量低,因此难以得出艾灸是控制 2 型糖尿病的有效干预措施的结论。可能需要进一步进行严格的 RCT 来评估艾灸对 2 型糖尿病的疗效。