Sunthadvanich R, Chiewsilp D, Seriwatana J, Sakazaki R, Echeverria P
Department of Medical Sciences, Thai Department of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Mar;28(3):469-72. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.3.469-472.1990.
Escherichia coli strains isolated from children with diarrhea were collected from 16 hospitals in different districts in Thailand during 1985 and 1986 and submitted to the National Reference Laboratory. Isolates were identified by serogrouping or as enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) adhesin factor (EAF) E. coli, or Shiga-like-toxin (SLT)-producing E. coli by DNA hybridization. EPEC strains of known serogroups were isolated from 10%, ETEC strains were isolated from 6%, EAF E. coli strains were isolated from 4%, EIEC strains were isolated from less than 1%, and SLT-producing E. coli strains were isolated from none of 393 children with diarrhea. Among 278 children whose ages were recorded, the highest rate of isolation of EAF E. coli was 11% (9 of 85) from children less than 6 months old. ETEC was isolated from 5% (4 of 85) of children less than 6 months old, from 10% (12 of 118) of children 6 to 23 months old, and from 1% (1 of 75) of children greater than 23 months old. EPEC strains of known serogroups were isolated from 18% (15 of 85) of children less than 6 months old, from 11% (13 of 118) of children 6 to 23 months old, and from 9% (7 of 75) of children greater than 23 months old. E. coli strains that hybridized with the EIEC probe were isolated from three children who were 20, 36, and 48 months old. Examining E. coli for hybridization with DNA probes for virulence determinants is a practical way of conducting nationwide surveillance of diarrhea-causing E. coli. Since only 33% (13 of 39) of EPEC serogroups hybridized with the EAF probe and none hybridized with the SLT probes, identification of EPEC by serogroups analysis, followed by serotyping, should continue to be used in the identification of EPEC.
1985年至1986年期间,从泰国不同地区的16家医院收集了从腹泻儿童中分离出的大肠杆菌菌株,并提交给国家参考实验室。通过血清分组或DNA杂交将分离株鉴定为产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)、侵袭性大肠杆菌(EIEC)、致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC)黏附因子(EAF)大肠杆菌或产志贺样毒素(SLT)大肠杆菌。在393名腹泻儿童中,已知血清型的EPEC菌株分离率为10%,ETEC菌株分离率为6%,EAF大肠杆菌菌株分离率为4%,EIEC菌株分离率不到1%,未分离出产SLT大肠杆菌菌株。在记录了年龄的278名儿童中,EAF大肠杆菌的最高分离率为11%(85名中的9名),来自6个月以下的儿童。ETEC在6个月以下儿童中的分离率为5%(85名中的4名),在6至23个月儿童中的分离率为10%(118名中的12名),在23个月以上儿童中的分离率为1%(75名中的1名)。已知血清型的EPEC菌株在6个月以下儿童中的分离率为18%(85名中的15名),在6至23个月儿童中的分离率为11%(118名中的13名),在23个月以上儿童中的分离率为9%(75名中的7名)。与EIEC探针杂交的大肠杆菌菌株从3名年龄分别为20、36和48个月的儿童中分离得到。检测大肠杆菌与毒力决定因素DNA探针的杂交是对引起腹泻的大肠杆菌进行全国性监测的一种实用方法。由于只有EPEC血清型的33%(39种中的13种)与EAF探针杂交,且没有一种与SLT探针杂交,因此通过血清分组分析然后进行血清分型来鉴定EPEC应继续用于EPEC的鉴定。