Centre for Interdisciplinary Mathematics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022827. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
The emergence of similar collective patterns from different self-propelled particle models of animal groups points to a restricted set of "universal" classes for these patterns. While universality is interesting, it is often the fine details of animal interactions that are of biological importance. Universality thus presents a challenge to inferring such interactions from macroscopic group dynamics since these can be consistent with many underlying interaction models. We present a Bayesian framework for learning animal interaction rules from fine scale recordings of animal movements in swarms. We apply these techniques to the inverse problem of inferring interaction rules from simulation models, showing that parameters can often be inferred from a small number of observations. Our methodology allows us to quantify our confidence in parameter fitting. For example, we show that attraction and alignment terms can be reliably estimated when animals are milling in a torus shape, while interaction radius cannot be reliably measured in such a situation. We assess the importance of rate of data collection and show how to test different models, such as topological and metric neighbourhood models. Taken together our results both inform the design of experiments on animal interactions and suggest how these data should be best analysed.
从不同的动物群体自推进粒子模型中出现类似的集体模式,指向了这些模式的受限的“通用”类别。虽然普遍性很有趣,但动物相互作用的细节往往具有生物学重要性。因此,普遍性对从宏观群体动力学推断这些相互作用提出了挑战,因为这些相互作用可以与许多潜在的相互作用模型一致。我们提出了一个贝叶斯框架,用于从群体中动物运动的精细记录中学习动物相互作用规则。我们将这些技术应用于从模拟模型推断相互作用规则的反问题,表明参数通常可以从少量观察中推断出来。我们的方法允许我们量化我们对参数拟合的信心。例如,我们表明,当动物在环形容器中碾磨时,可以可靠地估计吸引力和对齐项,而在这种情况下,无法可靠地测量相互作用半径。我们评估了数据收集速度的重要性,并展示了如何测试不同的模型,例如拓扑和度量邻域模型。总之,我们的结果不仅为动物相互作用的实验设计提供了信息,还提出了如何最好地分析这些数据。