• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗保健中高血压的非药物治疗:两种健康教育与营养策略的临床对比试验。

Non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension in primary health care: a comparative clinical trial of two education strategies in health and nutrition.

机构信息

Departamento de Nutrição e Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry Rolfs, s.n. - Campus Universitário, Viçosa - MG - Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 10;11:637. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-637.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-11-637
PMID:21831277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3171370/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension represents a serious challenge for public health policies in several countries. This study was conducted to compare two intervention strategies regarding the adherence of adult women to dietary changes recommended for the treatment of hypertension in a community covered by Primary Health Care Unit.

METHODS

This study is a randomized controlled trial of a sample composed of 28 women with hypertension enrolled in the Primary Health Care Unit located in the urban area of southeastern Brazil. The participants were already undergoing treatment for hypertension but devoid of nutritional care; and were divided into two groups, each composed of 14 individuals, who received interventions that consisted of two different strategies of nutritional guidance: monthly health education workshops alone (Group 1) and combined with family orientation through home visits (Group 2). Adherence to nutritional guidelines was evaluated by dietary, anthropometric, clinical and serum biochemical parameters, measured before and after the interventions. Knowledge on control and risk of hypertension was also investigated. The study lasted five months.

RESULTS

Mean age was 55.6 (± 2.8) and 50.7 (± 6.5) in the groups 1 and 2, respectively. The home orientation strategy promoted greater adherence to dietary changes, leading to a statistically significant improvement in the clinical, anthropometric, biochemical and dietary parameters. The group 2 reduced the consumption of risk foods (p = 0.01), oil (p = 0.002) and sugar (p = 0.02), and decreased body mass index (-0.7 kg/m2; p = 0.01); waist circumference (-4.2 cm; p = 0.001), systolic blood pressure (-13 mm HG; p = 0.004) and glycemia (-18.9 mg/dl; p = 0. 01). In group 1 only waist circumference (-2 cm; p = 0.01) changed significantly.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional orientations at the household level were more effective with regard to the adherence of individuals to non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension, regarding the reduction of clinical and behavioral risk parameters.

摘要

背景

在多个国家,高血压的非药物治疗依从性差是公共卫生政策面临的严峻挑战。本研究旨在比较两种干预策略对社区初级保健单位中成年女性高血压患者饮食改变的依从性,这些女性患者已经接受了高血压治疗,但未接受营养护理。

方法

这是一项在巴西东南部城市地区初级保健单位登记的 28 名高血压女性患者组成的随机对照试验。参与者正在接受高血压治疗,但缺乏营养护理;他们被分为两组,每组 14 人,分别接受两种不同的营养指导干预策略:仅每月进行健康教育培训(第 1 组)和结合家访的家庭定向(第 2 组)。通过饮食、人体测量、临床和血清生化参数来评估对营养指南的依从性,在干预前后进行测量。还调查了对高血压控制和风险的了解。研究持续五个月。

结果

第 1 组和第 2 组的平均年龄分别为 55.6(±2.8)和 50.7(±6.5)岁。家庭导向策略促进了对饮食改变的更大依从性,导致临床、人体测量、生化和饮食参数的统计学显著改善。第 2 组减少了风险食品的消费(p = 0.01)、油(p = 0.002)和糖(p = 0.02),并降低了体重指数(-0.7 kg/m2;p = 0.01);腰围(-4.2 cm;p = 0.001)、收缩压(-13 mm HG;p = 0.004)和血糖(-18.9 mg/dl;p = 0.01)。第 1 组仅腰围(-2 cm;p = 0.01)显著变化。

结论

在减少临床和行为风险参数方面,家庭层面的营养指导对个体对高血压非药物治疗的依从性更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e781/3171370/177d5e6ad9fd/1471-2458-11-637-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e781/3171370/8e7b37646417/1471-2458-11-637-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e781/3171370/177d5e6ad9fd/1471-2458-11-637-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e781/3171370/8e7b37646417/1471-2458-11-637-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e781/3171370/177d5e6ad9fd/1471-2458-11-637-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension in primary health care: a comparative clinical trial of two education strategies in health and nutrition.基层医疗保健中高血压的非药物治疗:两种健康教育与营养策略的临床对比试验。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 10;11:637. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-637.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Determinants and consequences of adherence to the dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet in African-American and white adults with high blood pressure: results from the ENCORE trial.高血压的非裔美国人和白人成年人坚持高血压饮食的决定因素和后果:来自 ENCORE 试验的结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Nov;112(11):1763-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
4
Adherence to the WCRF/AICR for Women in Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment submitted to Educational Nutritional Intervention.接受教育营养干预的乳腺癌辅助治疗女性对世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究学会建议的依从性
Nutr Cancer. 2018 Jul;70(5):737-747. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2017.1380207. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Effect of a 36-month pharmaceutical care program on the coronary heart disease risk in elderly diabetic and hypertensive patients.36 个月药物治疗方案对老年糖尿病合并高血压患者冠心病风险的影响。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2011;14(2):249-63. doi: 10.18433/j3259q.
6
Nursing case management for people with hypertension in primary health care: A randomized controlled trial.高血压患者的初级卫生保健中的护理病例管理:一项随机对照试验。
Res Nurs Health. 2020 Jan;43(1):68-78. doi: 10.1002/nur.21994. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
7
Effect of a Coordinated Community and Chronic Care Model Team Intervention vs Usual Care on Systolic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The SUCCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.社区与慢性病护理模式协同团队干预与常规护理对中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者收缩压的影响:SUCCEED随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036227. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36227.
8
The PREMIER intervention helps participants follow the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension dietary pattern and the current Dietary Reference Intakes recommendations.“总理干预措施”帮助参与者遵循“终止高血压膳食方法”饮食模式以及当前的膳食参考摄入量建议。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Sep;107(9):1541-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.06.019.
9
A randomized controlled trial of positive-affect intervention and medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans.一项针对非洲裔美国高血压患者的积极情绪干预与药物依从性的随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 27;172(4):322-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1307. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
10
A cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of culturally-appropriate hypertension education among Afro-Surinamese and Ghanaian patients in Dutch general practice: study protocol.一项评价在荷兰全科医疗中为非裔苏里南人和加纳裔患者提供文化适宜的高血压教育的效果的整群随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct 22;9:193. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-193.

引用本文的文献

1
Nutritional Discrepancies Among Inpatients and Outpatients Diagnosed with Hypertension.高血压住院患者与门诊患者的营养差异
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 24;12(21):2119. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212119.
2
Implementing (and evaluating) peer support with people living with noncommunicable diseases in humanitarian settings.在人道主义环境中,对非传染性疾病患者实施(并评估)同伴支持。
J Migr Health. 2024 Apr 9;9:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100229. eCollection 2024.
3
Putting nutrition education on the table: development of a curriculum to meet future doctors' needs.

本文引用的文献

1
[The promotion of health and integrated prevention of risk factors for cardiovascular diseases].[促进健康与综合预防心血管疾病风险因素]
Cien Saude Colet. 2012 Jan;17(1):7-17. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232012000100002.
2
Family medicine education in Brazil: challenges, opportunities, and innovations.巴西的家庭医学教育:挑战、机遇与创新。
Acad Med. 2008 Jul;83(7):684-90. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181782a67.
3
[Life in their eyes, heart in their hands: conceptions and representations of women in the process of health and disease].
将营养教育提上日程:开发满足未来医生需求的课程。
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2022 Sep 11;5(2):208-216. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000510. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Intersectoral Actions for the Promotion and Prevention of Obesity, Diabetes and Hypertension in Brazilian Cities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.跨部门行动促进和预防肥胖、糖尿病和高血压在巴西城市:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;19(20):13059. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013059.
5
Putting nutrition education on the table: development of a curriculum to meet future doctors' needs.将营养教育提上议程:开发满足未来医生需求的课程。
Br J Nutr. 2022 Sep 12;129(6):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522001635.
6
Cross-sectional study of prevalence and determinants of uncontrolled hypertension among South African adult residents of Mkhondo municipality.横断面研究:姆霍翁多市南非成年居民中未控制高血压的患病率及其决定因素。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):1069. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09174-7.
7
Effectiveness of Educational Interventions on Adherence to Lifestyle Modifications Among Hypertensive Patients: An Integrative Review.教育干预对高血压患者生活方式改变依从性的影响:综合评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 7;17(7):2513. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072513.
8
Interventions targeting hypertension and diabetes mellitus at community and primary healthcare level in low- and middle-income countries:a scoping review.在中低收入国家的社区和初级卫生保健层面针对高血压和糖尿病的干预措施:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):1542. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7842-6.
9
Diabetes Self-Management Education in the Home.家庭中的糖尿病自我管理教育
Cureus. 2016 Jul 25;8(7):e710. doi: 10.7759/cureus.710.
10
Educational interventions for improving control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension: a systematic review protocol.改善高血压患者血压控制的教育干预措施:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 31;5(3):e006583. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006583.
眼中的生活,手中的关怀:健康与疾病过程中女性的观念与形象
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2007 Jul-Sep;14(3):779-800. doi: 10.1590/s0104-59702007000300006.
4
Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions.描述复杂干预随机试验的图形方法。
BMJ. 2007 Jan 20;334(7585):127-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39045.396817.68.
5
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2006: response to the American Diabetes Association.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2006》:对美国糖尿病协会的回应
Diabetes Care. 2006 Nov;29(11):2563-4; author reply 2564-5. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0805.
6
Dietary interventions on blood pressure: the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) trials.饮食干预对血压的影响:终止高血压膳食疗法(DASH)试验
Nutr Rev. 2006 Feb;64(2 Pt 2):S53-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00234.x.
7
Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.初级保健对卫生系统和健康的贡献。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x.
8
A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part II).一项关于增强自我效能干预措施以减少慢性残疾的研究证据综述与整合:对健康教育实践的启示(第二部分)
Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):148-56. doi: 10.1177/1524839904266792.
9
An assessment of factors contributing to treatment adherence and knowledge of TB transmission among patients on TB treatment.对结核病治疗患者中影响治疗依从性的因素及结核病传播知识的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2004 Dec 29;4:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-68.
10
Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.人类和实验动物血压测量的建议:第1部分:人类血压测量:美国心脏协会高血压研究委员会专业与公众教育小组委员会给专业人士的声明
Hypertension. 2005 Jan;45(1):142-61. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000150859.47929.8e. Epub 2004 Dec 20.