• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AASAP:一个提高临床试验招募和保留率的项目。

AASAP: a program to increase recruitment and retention in clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.002
PMID:21831557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3219807/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a theory based, subject-centered, staff/subject communication program, AASAP (anticipate, acknowledge, standardize, accept, plan), to increase recruitment and retention in RCTs.

METHODS

AASAP was evaluated with logistical regression by comparing rates of recruitment (at telephone screening, baseline assessment, initial intervention) and intervention retention (over 16 weeks) before (-AASAP) and after (+AASAP) it was introduced to a 3-arm RCT to reduce disease distress among highly distressed subjects with type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

Included were 250 subjects in -AASAP and 338 in +AASAP. Significant improvement in recruitment occurred at each of the 3 recruitment stages: agreed at screening (OR=2.52; p<0.001), attended baseline assessment (OR=1.91; p<0.001), attended initial intervention (OR=1.46; p<0.03). Higher education and shorter diabetes duration predicted better recruitment in -AASAP (OR=2.23; p<0.001), but not in +AASAP. AASAP also improved intervention retention over 16 weeks (OR=3.46; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

AASAP is a structured program of subject/staff communication that helps improve external validity by enhancing both subject recruitment and retention.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

AASAP can be taught to non-professional staff and can be adapted to a variety of health settings. It can also be used by clinicians to engage patients in programs of ongoing care.

摘要

目的

评估一种基于理论、以受试者为中心、强调医患沟通的方案 AASAP(预期、确认、标准化、接受、计划),以提高随机对照试验的招募和保留率。

方法

通过逻辑回归比较 AASAP 引入减少 2 型糖尿病高度困扰患者疾病困扰的 3 臂 RCT 前后(-AASAP 和 +AASAP)的招募率(电话筛查、基线评估、初始干预时)和干预保留率(16 周以上),评估 AASAP 的效果。

结果

共纳入 250 名 -AASAP 受试者和 338 名 +AASAP 受试者。在 3 个招募阶段均显著提高了招募率:筛选时同意(OR=2.52;p<0.001)、参加基线评估(OR=1.91;p<0.001)、参加初始干预(OR=1.46;p<0.03)。在 -AASAP 中,较高的教育程度和较短的糖尿病病程预测了更好的招募效果(OR=2.23;p<0.001),但在 +AASAP 中则不然。AASAP 还提高了 16 周的干预保留率(OR=3.46;p<0.05)。

结论

AASAP 是一种结构化的医患沟通方案,通过提高受试者的招募和保留率,有助于提高外部有效性。

实践意义

AASAP 可以教授给非专业人员,并适用于各种医疗环境。它也可以被临床医生用来让患者参与持续护理计划。

相似文献

1
AASAP: a program to increase recruitment and retention in clinical trials.AASAP:一个提高临床试验招募和保留率的项目。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
2
Participant recruitment and retention in a pilot program to prevent weight gain in low-income overweight and obese mothers.在一项预防低收入超重和肥胖母亲体重增加的试点计划中招募和保留参与者。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 21;9:424. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-424.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Strategies to improve recruitment and retention of older stroke survivors to a randomized clinical exercise trial.提高老年中风幸存者参与随机临床运动试验的招募率和保留率的策略。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Mar;23(3):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.03.031. Epub 2013 May 2.
5
Factors Associated With Dropout During Recruitment and Follow-Up Periods of a mHealth-Based Randomized Controlled Trial for Mobile.Net to Encourage Treatment Adherence for People With Serious Mental Health Problems.一项基于移动健康的随机对照试验(Mobile.Net)中,与招募期和随访期脱落相关的因素,该试验旨在鼓励严重精神健康问题患者坚持治疗。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 21;19(2):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6417.
6
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.提高随机试验中保留率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 3(12):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub2.
7
Participant withdrawal: challenges and practical solutions for recruitment and retention in clinical trials.参与者退出:临床试验招募与留存面临的挑战及实际解决方案
Creat Nurs. 2013;19(1):37-41. doi: 10.1891/1078-4535.19.1.37.
8
Recruiting and retaining low-income, multi-ethnic women into randomized controlled trials: successful strategies and staffing.招募和保留低收入、多种族的女性参与随机对照试验:成功的策略和人员配备。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):925-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
9
Identifying the participant characteristics that predict recruitment and retention of participants to randomised controlled trials involving children: a systematic review.确定预测儿童参与随机对照试验的招募和留存情况的参与者特征:一项系统综述。
Trials. 2016 Jun 22;17(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1415-0.
10
Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study.以患者为中心的随机对照研究的招募与保留
Trials. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2578-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Participation in Biobanking Related to Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.儿科参与与炎症性肠病相关的生物样本库建设
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2025 Feb;64(2):176-179. doi: 10.1177/00099228241254893. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Lessons learnt from the multi-centre LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy (LAVA) randomised controlled trial.多中心腹腔镜与经腹子宫切除术(LAVA)随机对照试验的经验教训。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Mar;16(1):35-45. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.1.003.
3
The development and acceptability of an educational and training intervention for recruiters to neonatal trials: the TRAIN project.招募新生儿试验研究人员的教育和培训干预措施的制定和可接受性:TRA IN 项目。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Nov 11;23(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02086-1.
4
Addressing tobacco use in the context of complex social needs: A new conceptual framework and approach to address smoking cessation in community health centers.在复杂社会需求背景下应对烟草使用:一种用于社区卫生中心戒烟的新概念框架和方法。
PEC Innov. 2021 Nov 26;1:100011. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100011. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
A Pilot Study to Examine the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Virtual Adaptation of an In-Person Adolescent Diabetes Prevention Program.一项检验基于面对面式青少年糖尿病预防项目的虚拟改编版本的可行性和可接受性的初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912286.
6
The impact of enhancing self-management support for diabetes in Community Health Centers through patient engagement and relationship building: a primary care pragmatic cluster-randomized trial.通过患者参与和建立关系来增强社区卫生中心的糖尿病自我管理支持的影响:一项初级保健实用群组随机试验。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Oct 7;12(9):909-918. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac046.
7
Primary Caregiver Retention and Perceptions of Retention Strategies in a 36-Month Prospective Childhood Caries Study.36 个月前瞻性儿童龋齿研究中主要照顾者的保留率及其对保留策略的看法。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221097668. doi: 10.1177/21501319221097668.
8
Facilitating participation in cardiovascular preventive initiatives among people with diabetes: a qualitative study.促进糖尿病患者参与心血管疾病预防倡议:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10172-6.
9
Withdrawal reasons of randomized controlled trials on type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.随机对照试验中 2 型糖尿病停药原因的系统评价。
Daru. 2021 Jun;29(1):39-50. doi: 10.1007/s40199-020-00380-7. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
10
Opportunities and challenges of delivering digital clinical trials: lessons learned from a randomised controlled trial of an online behavioural intervention for children and young people.开展数字化临床试验的机遇与挑战:从一项针对儿童和青少年的在线行为干预随机对照试验中汲取的经验教训
Trials. 2020 Dec 9;21(1):1011. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04902-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Using social exchange theory to guide successful study recruitment and retention.运用社会交换理论指导成功的研究招募与留存。
Nurse Res. 2010;17(2):74-82. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.01.17.2.74.c7464.
2
Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity.临床研究定性评估清单,特别关注外部效度和模型效度。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Dec 11;6:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-56.
3
Assessment of generalisability in trials of health interventions: suggested framework and systematic review.健康干预试验中的可推广性评估:建议框架与系统评价
BMJ. 2006 Aug 12;333(7563):346-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7563.346.
4
External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".随机对照试验的外部效度:“该试验结果适用于谁?”
Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.
5
Are we missing anything? Pursuing research on attrition.我们遗漏了什么吗?开展关于损耗的研究。
Can J Nurs Res. 2004 Sep;36(3):82-98.
6
Research fundamentals: follow-up of subjects in clinical trials: addressing subject attrition.研究基础:临床试验中受试者的随访:应对受试者流失
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Aug;11(8):859-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb00769.x.
7
A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers.一种在药物滥用者纵向研究中实现随访率超过90%的可复制模型。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Apr 9;74(1):21-36. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.11.007.
8
The Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Trial (ENRICHD): strategies and techniques for enhancing retention of patients with acute myocardial infarction and depression or social isolation.冠心病强化康复试验(ENRICHD):提高急性心肌梗死合并抑郁或社交孤立患者留存率的策略与技术
J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):269-80. doi: 10.1097/00008483-200307000-00004.
9
What does it take to retain substance-abusing adolescents in research protocols? Delineation of effort required, strategies undertaken, costs incurred, and 6-month post-treatment differences by retention difficulty.要让滥用药物的青少年继续参与研究方案需要付出什么?按留住的难度划分所需的努力、采取的策略、产生的成本以及治疗后6个月的差异。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Jan 24;69(1):73-85. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00252-1.
10
Missing data: our view of the state of the art.缺失数据:我们对当前技术水平的看法。
Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77.