Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences and Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Am J Addict. 2011 Sep-Oct;20(5):397-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00153.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
Buprenorphine induction poses a barrier for physician adoption of office-based opioid dependence treatment. We conducted a retrospective chart review of the first 41 patients inducted at a newly established outpatient treatment program to examine the induction process and determine strategies associated with greater induction efficiency. Timed withdrawal scales, medication log, and notes enabled reconstruction of the initial day of buprenorphine treatment. To assess change with experience, consecutive patients were divided into three chronological groups for analyses (Phases 1-3). The time required for induction was substantial in Phase 1 (mean 5.5 hours), but temporal efficiency improved to a mean 1.5 hours spent at the program by Phase 3 (p < .001). Phase 2-3 patients arrived to the program after significantly longer opioid abstinence and were in greater withdrawal, with mean Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale scores of 6, 10, and 10 for Phases 1-3, respectively (p < .01). Patients in the later phases had less time delay to medication initiation, 5 minutes in Phase 3 compared to 133 minutes in Phase 1 (p < .001). The mean 7-mg buprenorphine dose administered in the office did not differ between groups, but occurred over a smaller time interval for later phases indicating more rapid titration. Patients in the later phases had more rapid withdrawal relief after buprenorphine initiation and were more likely to have used preinduction ancillary withdrawal medication. The study sheds light on the induction barrier and provides practical procedural information to inform clinical guidelines and hopefully mitigate procedural aspects of the induction barrier.
丁丙诺啡诱导对医生采用门诊阿片类药物依赖治疗构成障碍。我们对新建立的门诊治疗计划中的前 41 名患者进行了回顾性图表审查,以检查诱导过程并确定与更高诱导效率相关的策略。定时撤药量表、用药记录和笔记使我们能够重建丁丙诺啡治疗的初始日。为了评估经验带来的变化,连续的患者被分为三个时间顺序组进行分析(第 1-3 阶段)。第 1 阶段的诱导时间很长(平均 5.5 小时),但随着时间的推移,第 3 阶段的效率提高到平均在该计划中花费 1.5 小时(p<0.001)。第 2-3 阶段的患者在阿片类药物戒断时间明显延长后到达该计划,并且在第 1-3 阶段的平均临床阿片类戒断量表评分分别为 6、10 和 10(p<0.01)。后期阶段的患者开始用药的时间延迟较少,第 3 阶段为 5 分钟,而第 1 阶段为 133 分钟(p<0.001)。办公室中给予的平均 7 毫克丁丙诺啡剂量在各组之间没有差异,但后期阶段的时间间隔较小,表明更快地滴定。丁丙诺啡起始后,后期阶段的患者更快地缓解戒断症状,并且更有可能使用诱导前辅助戒断药物。该研究揭示了诱导障碍,并提供了实用的程序信息,以告知临床指南,并希望减轻诱导障碍的程序方面。