School of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, Dorset BH1 1LH, United Kingdom.
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Jul;32(5):545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
This paper is based on a study of relationships between Internationally Recruited Nurse (IRN) mentors and White students in one nurse education department in England (Scammell, 2010). The aim of the study was to analyse mentorship relationships, focusing on interaction in which perceptions of difference were in play. The research drew upon the principles of qualitative ethnography. Data were collected through focus groups, interviews, participant observation and documentary analysis. The purposive sample included 10 IRNs, 23 nursing students, two lecturers and five placement-based staff development nurses. The data were analysed thematically. Essentialist constructions of different 'cultures' emerged amongst students speaking of their experiences with IRN mentors. These were used to explain and justify differences in practice and often to portray IRN education as inferior. Difference was viewed as a problem, leading to the reinforcement of boundaries that differentiate 'them' from 'us'. Racism was denied as a source of these views. The findings suggest that Whiteness as a source of power was influential in the production of racism within everyday nursing practice. Whiteness appeared to be normalised: essentially nurse education is seen through a White lens. Students require deeper sociological understandings to better equip them to recognise and to challenge racism and to acknowledge their own part in its reconstruction.
本文基于对英格兰某护士教育系国际招聘护士(IRN)导师与白人学生之间关系的研究(Scammell,2010)。该研究旨在分析指导关系,重点关注存在差异感知的互动。研究采用了定性民族志的原则。通过焦点小组、访谈、参与观察和文献分析收集数据。有目的的样本包括 10 名 IRN、23 名护理学生、两名讲师和 5 名基于实习的员工发展护士。数据进行了主题分析。学生们在谈论与 IRN 导师的经历时,出现了对不同“文化”的本质主义建构。这些被用来解释和证明实践中的差异,并且常常将 IRN 教育描绘为劣等。差异被视为一个问题,导致了“他们”和“我们”之间界限的强化。种族主义被否认是这些观点的根源。研究结果表明,作为权力来源的白人身份在日常护理实践中产生种族主义方面具有影响力。白人身份似乎被正常化:本质上,护士教育是通过白人视角来看待的。学生需要更深入的社会学理解,以更好地识别和挑战种族主义,并承认自己在其重建中的作用。