Zanatta Fabrício Batistin, Bergoli Anieli Dossa, Werle Stefanie Bressan, Antoniazzi Raquel Pippi
Franciscan University Center, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2011;9(2):177-83.
To compare the removal of dental biofilm with soft and medium filament toothbrushes.
Twenty-five patients refrained from performing mechanical or chemical plaque control for 96 hours prior to the experiment in order to allow dental biofilm accumulation on the tooth surfaces. After the period of dental biofilm accumulation, quadrants were randomised and participants brushed different quadrants with soft and medium toothbrushes, with or without dentifrice. After plaque disclosure, the Quigley-Hein (Turesky) plaque index was assessed by a blinded examiner before and after toothbrushing. In addition, photographs before and after brushing were taken for evaluation of gingival abrasion.
The results revealed that medium toothbrushes removed high amounts of dental biofilm compared to soft toothbrushes (P < 0.05). Considering gingival abrasion, intergroup analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference on the cervical regions, with a higher proportion of abrasions in the medium toothbrush group (P < 0.01).
Medium toothbrushes have a greater ability to remove biofilm and cause gingival abrasion than do soft toothbrushes.
比较软毛和中毛牙刷清除牙菌斑生物膜的效果。
25名患者在实验前96小时停止进行机械或化学菌斑控制,以使牙菌斑生物膜在牙齿表面积聚。在牙菌斑生物膜积聚期过后,将象限随机分组,参与者用软毛和中毛牙刷在不同象限刷牙,刷牙时使用或不使用牙膏。牙菌斑显示后,由一位不知情的检查者在刷牙前后评估Quigley-Hein(Turesky)菌斑指数。此外,在刷牙前后拍照以评估牙龈磨损情况。
结果显示,与软毛牙刷相比,中毛牙刷清除的牙菌斑生物膜量更多(P < 0.05)。考虑到牙龈磨损,组间分析显示在颈部区域存在统计学上的显著差异,中毛牙刷组的磨损比例更高(P < 0.01)。
与软毛牙刷相比,中毛牙刷清除生物膜的能力更强,但会导致牙龈磨损。