Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Apr 4;12(3):3422. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3422.
The purpose was to determine dose-delivery errors resulting from systematic rotational setup errors for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using direct simulation in a treatment planning system. Ten patients with brain tumors who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy had dose distributions re-evaluated to assess the impact of systematic rotational setup errors. The dosimetric effect of rotational setup errors was simulated by rotating images and contours using a 3 by 3 rotational matrix. Combined rotational errors of ± 1°, ± 3°, ± 5° and ± 7° and residual translation errors of 1 mm along each axis were simulated. Dosimetric effects of the rotated images were evaluated by recomputing dose distributions and compared with the original plan. The mean volume of CTV that received the prescription dose decreased from 99.3% ± 0.5% (original) to 98.6% ± 1.6% (± 1°), 97.0% ± 2.0% (± 3°), 93.1% ± 4.6% (± 5°), and 87.8% ± 14.2% (± 7°). Minimal changes in the cold and hot spots were seen in the CTV. In general, the increase in the volumes of the organs at risk (OARs) receiving the tolerance doses was small and did not exceed the tolerance, except for cases where the OARs were in close proximity to the PTV. For intracranial tumors treated with IMRT with a CTV-to-PTV margin of 3 mm, rotational setup errors of 3° or less didn't decrease the CTV coverage to less than 95% in most cases. However, for large targets with irregular or elliptical shapes, the target coverage decreased significantly as rotational errors of 5° or more were present. Our results indicate that setup margins are warranted even in the absence of translational setup errors to account for rotational setup errors. Rotational setup errors should be evaluated carefully for clinical cases involving large tumor sizes and for targets with elliptical or irregular shape, as well as when isocenter is away from the center of the PTV or OARs are in close proximity to the target volumes.
目的是通过治疗计划系统中的直接模拟来确定分次立体定向放射治疗中由于系统旋转设置误差导致的剂量传递误差。对 10 名接受强度调制放射治疗的脑肿瘤患者进行了剂量分布重新评估,以评估系统旋转设置误差的影响。通过使用 3x3 旋转矩阵旋转图像和轮廓来模拟旋转设置误差的剂量学效应。模拟了沿每个轴的±1°、±3°、±5°和±7°的组合旋转误差以及 1mm 的残余平移误差。通过重新计算剂量分布并与原始计划进行比较来评估旋转图像的剂量学效应。CTV 接收到处方剂量的体积平均值从 99.3%±0.5%(原始)下降到 98.6%±1.6%(±1°)、97.0%±2.0%(±3°)、93.1%±4.6%(±5°)和 87.8%±14.2%(±7°)。CTV 中的冷热点变化最小。一般来说,除了 OAR 与 PTV 非常接近的情况外,接受耐受剂量的 OAR 体积增加很小,并未超过耐受量。对于 CTV 到 PTV 边缘为 3mm 的颅内肿瘤,3°或更小的旋转设置误差不会使大多数情况下的 CTV 覆盖率降低到 95%以下。然而,对于具有不规则或椭圆形形状的大靶区,当存在 5°或更大的旋转误差时,靶区覆盖率会显著降低。我们的结果表明,即使没有平移设置误差,也需要设置裕量来补偿旋转设置误差。对于涉及大肿瘤大小和靶区具有椭圆形或不规则形状的临床病例,以及当等中心远离 PTV 中心或 OAR 靠近靶区时,应仔细评估旋转设置误差。