• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克服机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的挑战。

Overcoming the challenges of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Barnet and Chase Farm NHS Trust, Enfield, London, UK.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Mar;15(1):1-7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2011.37. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1038/pcan.2011.37
PMID:21844888
Abstract

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the most commonly performed robotic procedure worldwide and is firmly established as a standard treatment option for localised prostate cancer. Part of the explanation for the rapid uptake of RARP is the reported gentler learning curve compared with the challenges of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). However, robotic surgery is still fraught with potential difficulties and avoiding complications while on the steepest part of the learning curve is critical. Furthermore, as surgeons progress there is a tendency to take on increasingly complex cases, including patients with difficult anatomy and prior surgery, and these cases present a unique challenge. Significant intra-abdominal adhesions may be identified following open surgery, or dense periprostatic inflammation may be encountered following TURP; large prostate gland size and median lobes may alter bladder neck anatomy, making difficult subsequent urethro-vesical anastomosis. Even experienced robotic surgeons will be challenged by salvage RARP. Approaching these problems in a structured manner allows many of the problems to be overcome. We discuss some of the specific techniques to deal with these potential difficulties and highlight ways to avoid making serious mistakes.

摘要

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)是全球最常进行的机器人手术,已被确立为局限性前列腺癌的标准治疗选择。RARP 迅速普及的部分原因是与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)的挑战相比,报告的学习曲线更为平缓。然而,机器人手术仍然存在潜在的困难,在学习曲线最陡峭的部分避免并发症至关重要。此外,随着外科医生的进步,他们倾向于接受越来越复杂的病例,包括解剖结构困难和先前手术的患者,这些病例带来了独特的挑战。开放性手术后可能会发现明显的腹腔内粘连,或 TURP 后可能会遇到致密的前列腺周围炎症;前列腺体积大和中叶可能会改变膀胱颈部解剖结构,使得随后的尿道膀胱吻合术变得困难。即使是经验丰富的机器人外科医生也会受到挽救性 RARP 的挑战。以结构化的方式处理这些问题可以克服许多问题。我们讨论了一些处理这些潜在困难的具体技术,并强调了避免犯严重错误的方法。

相似文献

1
Overcoming the challenges of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.克服机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的挑战。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Mar;15(1):1-7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2011.37. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
2
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
3
Outcomes of Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched Analysis.机器人辅助挽救性根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌局部消融术后与原发性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较:一项匹配分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1192-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
4
Is the learning curve of the urology resident for conventional radical prostatectomy similar to that of staff initiating robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?对于传统根治性前列腺切除术,泌尿科住院医师的学习曲线是否与开始机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的医生相似?
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 May-Jun;50(3):335-345. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9909.
5
Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的最佳实践:帕萨迪纳共识小组的建议。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):368-81. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.057. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
6
The Surgical Learning Curve for Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助前列腺根治术后生化复发的手术学习曲线。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Aug;6(4):414-421. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
7
[Methods for training of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy].[机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的培训方法]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2019(1):89-94. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia201901189.
8
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Fine-tuning robot-assisted radical prostatectomy planning with MRI.利用 MRI 对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术进行精细调整。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug;31(6):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
10
Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review.腹腔镜和机器人辅助前列腺手术的学习曲线:系统搜索和综述。
World J Urol. 2022 Apr;40(4):929-949. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03815-1. Epub 2021 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
What defines the "value" of robotic surgery for patients with gastrointestinal cancers? Perspectives from a U.S. Cancer Center.什么决定了机器人手术对胃肠道癌症患者的“价值”?来自美国一家癌症中心的观点。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Mar 21;8(4):566-579. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12792. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Human visual explanations mitigate bias in AI-based assessment of surgeon skills.人类视觉解释可减轻基于人工智能的外科医生技能评估中的偏差。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Mar 30;6(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00766-2.
3
A multi-institutional study using artificial intelligence to provide reliable and fair feedback to surgeons.
一项使用人工智能为外科医生提供可靠且公平反馈的多机构研究。
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Mar 30;3(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00263-3.
4
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning curves and outcomes from an Australian perspective.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:从澳大利亚视角看学习曲线与手术结果
Prostate Int. 2023 Mar;11(1):51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
5
Increased body mass index is associated with operative difficulty during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.体重指数增加与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术期间的手术难度相关。
BJUI Compass. 2021 Sep 27;3(1):68-74. doi: 10.1002/bco2.110. eCollection 2022 Jan.
6
Assessment of Out-of-Pocket Costs for Robotic Cancer Surgery in US Adults.美国成年人机器人癌症手术自付费用评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919185. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19185.
7
Safe surgery in the elderly: A review of outcomes following robotic proctectomy from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in a cross-sectional study.老年人的安全手术:一项横断面研究中基于全国住院患者样本的机器人直肠切除术术后结果综述。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Jun 20;44:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.06.004. eCollection 2019 Aug.
8
Salvage robotic prostatectomy and high risk disease: what else can we do?
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):197-198. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0628-2. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and previous surgical history: a multidisciplinary approach.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与既往手术史:多学科方法
J Robot Surg. 2013 Jun;7(2):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0358-z. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
10
Safety of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with prior abdominopelvic or inguinal surgery.既往有腹盆腔或腹股沟手术史患者行微创根治性前列腺切除术的安全性。
J Endourol. 2015 Feb;29(2):192-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0449. Epub 2014 Oct 7.