• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预措施在因肌肉骨骼疾病导致长期病假后使员工重返工作岗位的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of interventions to return employees to work following long-term sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders.

机构信息

The School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34(1):115-24. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr057. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdr057
PMID:21846930
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sickness absence costs the UK economy around £20 billion per year. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions to return employees with musculoskeletal disorders to work, one of the major causes of long-term sickness absence, using a mathematical model.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of three interventions: a workplace intervention; a physical activity and education intervention and a physical activity, education and workplace visit intervention. Extensive sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of uncertainties upon the model results.

RESULTS

All interventions assessed are estimated to have a cost per quality-adjusted life year gained below £3000 compared with usual care within the UK from a National Health Service (NHS) or societal perspective. Moreover, any intervention which returns at least an additional 3% of employees to work and costs less than an additional £3000 per employee, is likely to be considered economically attractive compared with usual care, relative to other interventions routinely funded by the NHS.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first economic evaluation in this area which extrapolates data beyond trial follow-up and synthesizes evidence from numerous sources. This sort of modelling approach should be considered for informing other public health policy decisions.

摘要

背景

英国每年因员工患病缺勤而损失约 200 亿英镑。本研究旨在使用数学模型评估干预措施对返回患有肌肉骨骼疾病员工的成本效益,这些干预措施是导致长期患病缺勤的主要原因之一。

方法

开发了一个马尔可夫模型来评估三种干预措施的成本效益:工作场所干预、身体活动和教育干预以及身体活动、教育和工作场所访问干预。进行了广泛的敏感性分析,以评估不确定性对模型结果的影响。

结果

从英国国民保健制度(NHS)或社会角度来看,与常规护理相比,所有评估的干预措施都预计每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本低于 3000 英镑。此外,任何能够使至少额外 3%的员工返回工作岗位且每个员工的成本低于 3000 英镑的干预措施,与 NHS 常规资助的其他干预措施相比,都可能被认为具有成本效益。

结论

这是该领域的首次经济评估,它将数据外推到试验随访之外,并综合了来自多个来源的证据。这种建模方法应考虑用于为其他公共卫生政策决策提供信息。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of interventions to return employees to work following long-term sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders.干预措施在因肌肉骨骼疾病导致长期病假后使员工重返工作岗位的成本效益。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34(1):115-24. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr057. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
2
Prevention of recurrent sickness absence among employees with common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial with cost-benefit and effectiveness evaluation.预防常见精神障碍员工再次缺勤:一项具有成本效益和有效性评估的集群随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 15;10:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-132.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of a Problem-Solving Intervention Aimed to Prevent Sickness Absence among Employees with Common Mental Disorders or Occupational Stress.旨在预防患有常见心理障碍或职业压力员工缺勤的问题解决干预措施的成本效益。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;17(14):5234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145234.
4
Cost-effectiveness of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: design of a randomised controlled trial.参与式重返工作岗位干预对因肌肉骨骼疾病而临时派遣工人和失业工人的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Mar 28;11:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-60.
5
Preventing sickness absenteeism among employees with common mental disorders or stress-related symptoms at work: Design of a cluster randomized controlled trial of a problem-solving based intervention versus care-as-usual conducted at the Occupational Health Services.预防患有常见精神障碍或工作中与压力相关症状的员工旷工:在职业健康服务机构进行的一项基于问题解决的干预措施与常规护理的整群随机对照试验设计。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 12;17(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4329-1.
6
Cost-effectiveness of yoga for managing musculoskeletal conditions in the workplace.瑜伽在管理工作场所肌肉骨骼疾病方面的成本效益。
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Dec 30;67(9):687-695. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx161.
7
Cost-effectiveness of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: design of a randomized controlled trial.针对患有常见精神障碍的病假员工的工作场所干预措施的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的设计
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jan 14;8:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-12.
8
Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a  study protocol.一项多组分职业康复计划(增加了工作场所干预措施)的效果、健康经济学和利益相关者观点评估研究的设计 - 研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5130-5.
9
Design of a trial-based economic evaluation on the cost-effectiveness of employability interventions among work disabled employees or employees at risk of work disability: the CASE-study.基于试验的工作残疾或面临工作残疾风险的员工就业能力干预措施的成本效益的经济性评价设计:CASE 研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 18;12:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-43.
10
An occupational health intervention programme for workers at high risk for sickness absence. Cost effectiveness analysis based on a randomised controlled trial.一项针对高病假风险工人的职业健康干预计划。基于随机对照试验的成本效益分析。
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;65(4):242-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.033167. Epub 2007 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Social interventions to support people with disability: A systematic review of economic evaluation studies.支持残疾人的社会干预措施:经济评估研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0278930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278930. eCollection 2023.
2
Financing Costs and Health Effects of Air Pollution in the Tri-City Agglomeration.三市城市群的空气污染造成的融资成本和健康影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 4;10:831312. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.831312. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol.
比较两种针对病假员工的跨学科职业康复计划:一项混合方法设计研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3.
4
Evaluation of the efficacy of a short-course, personalized self-management and intensive spa therapy intervention as active prevention of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities (Muska): a research protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估短期、个性化自我管理和强化水疗干预作为上肢肌肉骨骼疾病主动预防措施(Muska)的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Dec 9;17(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1353-8.
5
Vocational Rehabilitation: Supporting Ill or Disabled Individuals in (to) Work: A UK Perspective.职业康复:支持患病或残疾人士重返工作岗位:英国视角。
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Jul 16;4(3):46. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030046.
6
The cost-effectiveness of supported employment for adults with autism in the United Kingdom.英国针对自闭症成年人的支持性就业的成本效益
Autism. 2014 Nov;18(8):975-84. doi: 10.1177/1362361313505720. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire to Spanish spoken in Spain.《工作角色功能问卷》的跨文化适应:以西班牙语在西班牙的使用为例。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Dec;23(4):566-75. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9420-6.