• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿患者的局部麻醉:外用复方苯佐卡因与利多卡因对比

Local anesthesia in pediatric patients: topical TAC versus lidocaine.

作者信息

Anderson A B, Colecchi C, Baronoski R, DeWitt T G

机构信息

Division of General and Community Pediatrics, University of Massahusetts Medical Center, Worcester.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1990 May;19(5):519-22. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82182-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82182-1
PMID:2184706
Abstract

Lacerations requiring sutures are a common surgical emergency in children. Traditional anesthesia prior to suturing has been intradermal lidocaine. TAC (0.5% tetracaine, 1:2,000 adrenalin, 11.8% cocaine) is a topically applied anesthetic. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical study was conducted to test the hypothesis that topical TAC and intradermal lidocaine are equally efficacious with respect to patient compliance with the suturing process, ie, anesthetic application and placement of sutures, and development of wound complications. Patients less than 18 years old, with lacerations 5 cm or less in length, located in well vascularized, nonmucous membrane areas were included. Patients were entered into the intradermal or topical groups; the intradermal group received lidocaine and the topical group was randomized to receive either TAC or placebo. One hundred fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the rates of successful initial anesthesia with TAC (89%) and lidocaine (79%). TAC was significantly better (P less than .002) with regard to patient compliance with the suturing process than lidocaine or placebo. Seventeen percent of patients who received placebo had initial anesthesia. These results suggest that TAC, when applied correctly, may be the preferred anesthetic for laceration repair in children.

摘要

需要缝合的裂伤是儿童常见的外科急症。传统的缝合前麻醉方法是皮内注射利多卡因。TAC(0.5%丁卡因、1:2000肾上腺素、11.8%可卡因)是一种局部应用的麻醉剂。进行了一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床研究,以检验以下假设:局部应用TAC和皮内注射利多卡因在患者对缝合过程(即麻醉剂应用和缝线放置)的依从性以及伤口并发症的发生方面同样有效。纳入年龄小于18岁、裂伤长度为5 cm或更短、位于血运良好的非黏膜区域的患者。患者被分为皮内注射组或局部应用组;皮内注射组接受利多卡因,局部应用组随机接受TAC或安慰剂。151名患者参与了该研究。TAC(89%)和利多卡因(79%)的首次麻醉成功率无显著差异。在患者对缝合过程的依从性方面,TAC显著优于利多卡因或安慰剂(P小于0.002)。接受安慰剂的患者中有17%实现了首次麻醉。这些结果表明,正确应用时,TAC可能是儿童裂伤修复的首选麻醉剂。

相似文献

1
Local anesthesia in pediatric patients: topical TAC versus lidocaine.小儿患者的局部麻醉:外用复方苯佐卡因与利多卡因对比
Ann Emerg Med. 1990 May;19(5):519-22. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82182-1.
2
Lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine gel versus tetracaine adrenaline cocaine gel for topical anesthesia in linear scalp and facial lacerations in children aged 5 to 17 years.利多卡因肾上腺素丁卡因凝胶与丁卡因肾上腺素可卡因凝胶用于5至17岁儿童头皮线性裂伤和面部裂伤的局部麻醉比较
Pediatrics. 1995 Feb;95(2):255-8.
3
Tetracaine, epinephrine (adrenalin), and cocaine (TAC) versus lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine (LET) for anesthesia of lacerations in children.丁卡因、肾上腺素(肾上腺素)和可卡因(TAC)与利多卡因、肾上腺素和丁卡因(LET)用于儿童裂伤麻醉的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Feb;25(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70325-x.
4
Comparison of tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine (TAC) with topical lidocaine-epinephrine (TLE): efficacy and cost.丁卡因-肾上腺素-可卡因(TAC)与局部用利多卡因-肾上腺素(TLE)的比较:疗效与成本
Am J Emerg Med. 1995 May;13(3):315-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90209-0.
5
Comparison of topical anesthetics without cocaine to tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine and lidocaine infiltration during repair of lacerations: bupivacaine-norepinephrine is an effective new topical anesthetic agent.在伤口缝合修复过程中,不含可卡因的局部麻醉剂与丁卡因-肾上腺素-可卡因及利多卡因浸润麻醉的比较:布比卡因-去甲肾上腺素是一种有效的新型局部麻醉剂。
Pediatrics. 1996 Mar;97(3):301-7.
6
Comparison of topical anesthetics with lidocaine infiltration during laceration repair in children.儿童裂伤修复时局部麻醉药与利多卡因浸润的比较。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1997 Jan;36(1):17-23. doi: 10.1177/000992289703600103.
7
Efficacy of topical anesthesia in children.局部麻醉在儿童中的疗效。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 May;150(5):466-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170300020005.
8
New non-cocaine-containing topical anesthetics compared with tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine during repair of lacerations.在裂伤修复过程中,将新型不含可卡因的局部麻醉剂与丁卡因-肾上腺素-可卡因进行比较。
Pediatrics. 1997 Nov;100(5):825-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.5.825.
9
EMLA versus TAC for topical anesthesia of extremity wounds in children.用于儿童四肢伤口局部麻醉的复方利多卡因乳膏与丁卡因对比研究
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Aug;30(2):163-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70136-7.
10
Pretreatment of lacerations with lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine at triage: a randomized double-blind trial.在分诊时用利多卡因、肾上腺素和丁卡因预处理撕裂伤:一项随机双盲试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jul;7(7):751-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02262.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Topical anaesthetics for pain control during repair of dermal laceration.用于皮肤裂伤修复过程中疼痛控制的局部麻醉剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 22;2(2):CD005364. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005364.pub3.
2
Percutaneous dermal drug delivery for local pain control.经皮真皮药物递送用于局部疼痛控制。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2006 Mar;2(1):99-113.
3
Topical adrenaline and cocaine gel for anaesthetising children's lacerations. An audit of acceptability and safety.用于儿童裂伤麻醉的局部用肾上腺素和可卡因凝胶。可接受性和安全性审计。
Emerg Med J. 2004 Mar;21(2):194-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.010108.
4
Is cocaine needed in topical anaesthesia?局部麻醉中需要使用可卡因吗?
Emerg Med J. 2002 Sep;19(5):418-22. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.5.418.
5
Clinical use of cocaine. A review of the risks and benefits.
Drug Saf. 1993 Sep;9(3):212-7. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199309030-00006.
6
Analgesia in children. Why is it underused in emergency departments?儿童镇痛。为何在急诊科未得到充分利用?
Drug Saf. 1992 Jan-Feb;7(1):8-13. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199207010-00003.