de Freitas Santos Paranhos Juliane, Avila Marcos Pereira, Paranhos Augusto, Schor Paulo
Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1057-62. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S23147. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
To prospectively evaluate intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation on quality of life (QoL) of patients with keratoconus changes and identify factors responsible.
Sixty-nine eyes of 42 keratoconus patients were implanted with the Keraring (Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refraction, and steep keratometry were analyzed 3 months and 1 year after surgery. All patients self-administered the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of life instrument at 2 time points: after having worn best correction for at least 30 days since evaluation (mean 4 months after surgery) and 1 year after surgery. To analyze if the use of the appropriate correction at 1 year follow up had any impact on visual acuity and V-QoL, patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (appropriate correction) and B (not appropriate correction).
After 1 year, QoL changes related to scales 'clarity of vision', 'near vision', and 'far vision'. Keratometric values, sphere, and spherical equivalent did not differ significantly between 3 months and 1 year postoperative. Cylinder increase was statistically but not clinically significant. Binocular BCVA did not change 1 year after surgery in group A and showed a clinically significant impairment in group B. A year after surgery, 18 patients did not use correction suggested by a physician 3 months after surgery. QoL was not statistically different 1 year after surgery between group A and group B.
Our findings show that the way keratoconic patients see is difficult to analyze using only quantitative and 1-visit metrics. They highlight the importance of patients' self perception and performing longitudinal analysis to consider neural compensation to optical changes from surgery.
前瞻性评估角膜内环植入术(ICRS)对圆锥角膜患者生活质量(QoL)的影响,并确定相关因素。
42例圆锥角膜患者的69只眼植入了Keraring(巴西贝洛奥里藏特的Mediphacos公司生产)。在术后3个月和1年分析最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、屈光和陡峭角膜曲率。所有患者在两个时间点自行填写美国国立眼科研究所屈光不正生活质量量表:在自评估后佩戴最佳矫正眼镜至少30天(术后平均4个月)以及术后1年。为分析1年随访时使用适当矫正对视力和视觉生活质量是否有任何影响,将患者分为两组:A组(适当矫正)和B组(不适当矫正)。
1年后,生活质量的变化与“视力清晰度”“近视力”和“远视力”量表相关。术后3个月和1年之间,角膜曲率值、球镜和球镜等效值无显著差异。柱镜增加在统计学上有意义,但在临床上无显著意义。A组术后1年双眼BCVA未改变,B组则出现临床上显著的视力损害。术后1年,18例患者未采用术后3个月医生建议的矫正方法。术后1年,A组和B组之间的生活质量在统计学上无差异。
我们的研究结果表明,仅使用定量和单次就诊指标难以分析圆锥角膜患者的视力情况。这些结果凸显了患者自我认知以及进行纵向分析以考虑手术光学变化后的神经代偿的重要性。