Probst Carolina, Gethmann Jörn M, Höreth-Böntgen Detlef, Cussler Klaus, Conraths Franz J
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Wusterhausen.
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2011 Jul-Aug;124(7-8):282-7.
Farmers in south-eastern Germany who claimed adverse reactions due to the application of BTV-8 vaccines during the compulsory vaccination programme in 2008/2009 were invited to participate in an epidemiological study to prove whether there was evidence for a plausible relationship between the immunizations and the reported symptoms. Ten farms were available for on-site visits; all other farmers (N = 120) who had registered to participate in the study were asked to complete a questionnaire and to provide evidence for the claimed adverse reactions. 25 questionnaires were returned. Although a wide range of symptoms were reported, in most cases the documentation of clinical signs, pathological alterations and fatalities was not sufficient to conclude on a causal relationship. Similarly, most of the suspected adverse events evaluated as pharmacovigilance reports had to be categorized as "unclassified due to insufficient information".
德国东南部那些声称在2008/2009年强制疫苗接种计划期间因接种蓝舌病病毒8型(BTV-8)疫苗出现不良反应的农民受邀参加一项流行病学研究,以证明免疫接种与所报告症状之间是否存在合理关联的证据。有十个农场可供实地考察;所有其他登记参加该研究的农民(N = 120)被要求填写一份问卷,并提供所声称不良反应的证据。共收回25份问卷。尽管报告了各种各样的症状,但在大多数情况下,临床体征、病理改变和死亡情况的记录不足以得出因果关系的结论。同样,作为药物警戒报告评估的大多数疑似不良事件不得不归类为“因信息不足未分类”。