• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A national study of out-of-pocket expenditures for mammography screening.一项全国性的关于乳房 X 光筛查自付费用的研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Dec;20(12):1775-83. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2251. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
2
Financial barriers to mammography: who pays out-of-pocket?乳腺钼靶检查的经济障碍:谁自费支付?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Apr;16(3):349-60. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0072.
3
Role of health insurance coverage in women's access to prescription medicines.医疗保险覆盖范围在女性获取处方药方面的作用。
Womens Health Issues. 2007 Nov-Dec;17(6):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2007.08.004.
4
Being uninsured in 1996 compared to 1987: how has the experience of the uninsured changed over time?与1987年相比,1996年未参保的情况:未参保者的经历随时间发生了怎样的变化?
Health Serv Res. 2001 Dec;36(6 Pt 2):16-31.
5
Prevalence of Out-Of-Pocket Payments for Mammography Screening Among Recently Screened Women.最近接受过乳房 X 光筛查的女性中,自费进行乳房 X 光筛查的比例。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;28(7):910-918. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6973. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
6
Out-of-Pocket Spending and Premium Contributions After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施后的自付支出和保费缴纳情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):347-355. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8060.
7
Correlates of out-of-pocket and catastrophic health expenditures in Tanzania: results from a national household survey.坦桑尼亚自费和灾难性医疗支出的相关因素:一项全国家庭调查的结果
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2014 Mar 5;14:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-14-5.
8
Out-of-Pocket Spending for Ambulatory Physical Therapy Services From 2008 to 2012: National Panel Survey.2008年至2012年门诊物理治疗服务的自付费用:全国性抽样调查
Phys Ther. 2015 Dec;95(12):1680-91. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150018. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
9
Out-of-pocket spending and financial burden among low income adults after Medicaid expansions in the United States: quasi-experimental difference-in-difference study.美国医疗补助扩大后,低收入成年人的自付支出和经济负担:准实验性双重差分研究。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 5;368:m40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m40.
10
Giving birth at a health-care facility in rural China: is it affordable for the poor?在中国农村的医疗机构分娩:对于穷人来说负担得起吗?
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Feb 1;89(2):144-52. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.079434. Epub 2010 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Culture Is Key: Engaging Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations in Breast Cancer Screening in High Income Contexts: A Scoping Review.文化是关键:在高收入背景下让文化和语言多样化人群参与乳腺癌筛查:一项范围综述
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(7):e70817. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70817.
2
Downstream healthcare use following breast cancer screening: a register-based cohort study.乳腺癌筛查后的下游医疗保健利用情况:一项基于登记册的队列研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2025 Mar 10;79(4):242-248. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222818.
3
Reduced Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer among Women with Visual Impairment.视力障碍女性的乳腺癌乳房 X 光筛查减少。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Feb;128(2):317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.029. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
The Impact of Massachusetts Health Reform on Colorectal and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.马萨诸塞州医疗改革对结直肠癌和乳腺癌诊断分期的影响。
Med Care. 2020 Feb;58(2):183-191. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001241.
5
Prevalence of Out-Of-Pocket Payments for Mammography Screening Among Recently Screened Women.最近接受过乳房 X 光筛查的女性中,自费进行乳房 X 光筛查的比例。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;28(7):910-918. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6973. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
6
Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province.中国新型农村合作医疗制度的受益者是谁?以安徽省为例的一项研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun 5;16:195. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Interim final rules for group health plans and health insurance issuers relating to coverage of preventive services under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Interim final rules with request for comments.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》中关于团体健康计划和健康保险发行人预防性服务覆盖范围的暂行最终规则。附有征求意见的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Jul 19;75(137):41726-60.
2
Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009.
3
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):716-26, W-236. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008.
4
Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature.与乳房X光检查利用率相关的因素:文献的系统定量综述
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Nov;17(9):1477-98. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0603.
5
Lack of community insurance and mammography screening rates among insured and uninsured women.参保和未参保女性中社区保险的缺失及乳腺钼靶筛查率
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 10;26(11):1865-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5664.
6
Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in Medicare health plans.费用分担对医疗保险健康计划中乳腺钼靶筛查的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 24;358(4):375-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa070929.
7
Cost as a barrier to screening mammography among underserved women.费用成为服务不足女性进行乳腺钼靶筛查的障碍。
Ethn Health. 2007 Apr;12(2):189-203. doi: 10.1080/13557850601002387.
8
Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial.40岁起进行乳腺钼靶筛查对10年随访期乳腺癌死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验
Lancet. 2006 Dec 9;368(9552):2053-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69834-6.
9
Out-of-pocket financial burden for low-income families with children: socioeconomic disparities and effects of insurance.有子女的低收入家庭的自付经济负担:社会经济差异及保险的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1722-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00421.x.
10
Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer.筛查与辅助治疗对乳腺癌死亡率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1784-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050518.

一项全国性的关于乳房 X 光筛查自付费用的研究。

A national study of out-of-pocket expenditures for mammography screening.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-9510, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Dec;20(12):1775-83. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2251. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2010.2251
PMID:21848432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3236989/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify variations in screening mammography expenditures, primarily out-of-pocket and total expenditures, of women 40-64 years of age in the United States and factors associated with variations.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data collected from the 2007 and 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The sample included 2020 women 40-64 years of age who received one mammogram in 2007 or 2008. Ordinary least squares regression was used to describe relationships among out-of-pocket mammography expenditures, total mammography expenditures, and out-of-pocket mammography expenditures as a percentage of total mammography expenditures and such independent variables as insurance status and type, income, region of the United States, and type of facility where a mammogram was received.

RESULTS

The average out-of-pocket expenditure for a mammogram in 2007 or 2008 was $33, representing 14.1% of the total mammogram expenditure ($266). After controlling for demographic and health factors, women who were uninsured, were from the Midwest, and had a mammogram at an office-based facility had greater out-of-pocket mammography expenditures. Women who were uninsured, lived in the South, and received their mammogram at an office-based facility had out-of-pocket mammography expenditures that represented a greater proportion of the total mammography expenditures.

CONCLUSIONS

Large variations in out-of-pocket expenditures were observed among women with and without insurance and between insurance types, geographic regions of the United States, and types of facilities where mammograms were received. A higher financial burden of mammography screening among some subgroups of women may act as a barrier to future mammography screening.

摘要

目的

确定美国 40-64 岁女性筛查乳房 X 光摄影支出(主要为自付和总支出)的差异,以及与这些差异相关的因素。

方法

回顾性分析 2007 年和 2008 年医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)收集的数据。样本包括 2020 名 40-64 岁的女性,她们在 2007 年或 2008 年接受了一次乳房 X 光检查。使用普通最小二乘法回归描述自付乳房 X 光摄影支出、总乳房 X 光摄影支出以及自付乳房 X 光摄影支出占总乳房 X 光摄影支出的百分比与保险状况和类型、收入、美国地区以及接受乳房 X 光摄影的设施类型等独立变量之间的关系。

结果

2007 年或 2008 年接受乳房 X 光摄影的平均自付费用为 33 美元,占总乳房 X 光摄影支出(266 美元)的 14.1%。在控制人口统计学和健康因素后,未参保、来自中西部地区以及在以门诊为基础的医疗机构接受乳房 X 光摄影的女性自付乳房 X 光摄影支出更高。未参保、居住在南部地区以及在以门诊为基础的医疗机构接受乳房 X 光摄影的女性自付乳房 X 光摄影支出占总乳房 X 光摄影支出的比例更高。

结论

在有保险和无保险的女性之间以及在保险类型、美国地理位置和接受乳房 X 光摄影的设施类型之间观察到自付支出存在很大差异。一些女性亚组在乳房 X 光摄影筛查方面的经济负担较高,这可能成为未来乳房 X 光摄影筛查的障碍。