Suppr超能文献

美沙拉嗪直肠混悬液治疗活动期远端溃疡性结肠炎的早期症状反应和黏膜愈合-两项对照研究的补充结果。

Early symptomatic response and mucosal healing with mesalazine rectal suspension therapy in active distal ulcerative colitis--additional results from two controlled studies.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct;34(7):747-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04800.x. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rapid resolution of symptoms and endoscopic inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC) represent important treatment goals.

AIMS

To establish times to bleeding cessation and endoscopic healing for topical and oral mesalazine in active distal UC, a post hoc analysis of two published studies was performed.

METHODS

Study I (Sutherland 1987) compared mesalazine rectal suspension to placebo, while Study II (Safdi 1997) compared topical suspensions, either alone or in combination with oral mesalazine, and oral alone. Cessation of rectal bleeding (RB) was defined as absence of bleeding on four consecutive days. Endoscopic remission was defined as DAI mucosal healing (MH) subscore=0 and clinical remission as MH subscore =0-1 and ≥ 1-point improvement, plus RB subscore = 0.

RESULTS

Study I: By Day 2, 31.4% of subjects using topical monotherapy reported no RB vs. 5.5% in the placebo arm (P<0.0006); median time to RB cessation was 8 days. Significantly higher rates of endoscopic (25.0% vs. 7.8%, P<0.005) and clinical remission (48.6% vs. 9.6%, P<0.0001) were observed at Week 3. Study II: A significantly higher proportion of subjects achieved RB cessation with combination therapy vs. oral therapy, commencing by Day 8. By Week 3, a significantly higher proportion of subjects using combination therapy achieved clinical remission compared to oral therapy alone (57.9% vs. 18.2%, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical mesalazine suspension, either alone or in combination with oral mesalazine, led to earlier rectal bleeding cessation and mucosal healing. These data support use of topical therapy for more rapid treatment benefit in active distal ulcerative colitis.

摘要

背景

溃疡性结肠炎(UC)症状和内镜下炎症的快速缓解是重要的治疗目标。

目的

本研究旨在建立局部和口服美沙拉嗪治疗活动期远端 UC 患者的止血和内镜下愈合时间,为此对两项已发表研究进行了事后分析。

方法

研究 I(Sutherland 1987)比较了美沙拉嗪直肠混悬剂与安慰剂,研究 II(Safdi 1997)比较了局部混悬剂单独或联合口服美沙拉嗪以及口服美沙拉嗪的疗效。直肠出血停止定义为连续 4 天无出血。内镜缓解定义为 DAI 黏膜愈合(MH)亚评分=0 和临床缓解定义为 MH 亚评分=0-1 分且改善≥1 分,加上直肠出血亚评分=0。

结果

研究 I:第 2 天,使用局部单一疗法的受试者中 31.4%报告无直肠出血,而安慰剂组为 5.5%(P<0.0006);直肠出血停止的中位时间为 8 天。第 3 周时,内镜(25.0% vs. 7.8%,P<0.005)和临床缓解(48.6% vs. 9.6%,P<0.0001)的比例显著升高。研究 II:联合治疗组在第 8 天开始时,较口服治疗组有更高比例的患者达到直肠出血停止。第 3 周时,联合治疗组较口服治疗组有更高比例的患者达到临床缓解(57.9% vs. 18.2%,P<0.05)。

结论

局部美沙拉嗪混悬剂,无论是单独使用还是与口服美沙拉嗪联合使用,均能更早地停止直肠出血并促进黏膜愈合。这些数据支持在活动期远端溃疡性结肠炎中使用局部治疗以更快地获得治疗益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验