Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(4):710-9. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.602047. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
We examined what determines the typicality, or graded structure, of vocal emotion expressions. Separate groups of judges rated acted and spontaneous expressions of anger, fear, and joy with regard to their typicality and three main determinants of the graded structure of categories: category members' similarity to the central tendency of their category (CT); category members' frequency of instantiation, i.e., how often they are encountered as category members (FI); and category members' similarity to ideals associated with the goals served by its category, i.e., suitability to express particular emotions. Partial correlations and multiple regression analysis revealed that similarity to ideals, rather than CT or FI, explained most variance in judged typicality. Results thus suggest that vocal emotion expressions constitute ideal-based goal-derived categories, rather than taxonomic categories based on CT and FI. This could explain how prototypical expressions can be acoustically distinct and highly recognisable but occur relatively rarely in everyday speech.
我们研究了是什么决定了声音情绪表达的典型性或渐变结构。分别有几组评判者对愤怒、恐惧和喜悦的表演和自然表达进行了评判,评判内容包括它们的典型性,以及类别渐变结构的三个主要决定因素:类别成员与类别中心趋势(CT)的相似性;类别成员的实例化频率,即作为类别成员出现的频率(FI);以及与目标相关的理想成员与目标的相似性,即表达特定情绪的适宜性。偏相关和多元回归分析表明,与理想的相似性而非 CT 或 FI 解释了判断典型性的大部分差异。因此,研究结果表明,声音情绪表达构成了基于理想的目标衍生类别,而不是基于 CT 和 FI 的分类类别。这可以解释为什么原型表达在声学上可以明显区分,并且高度可识别,但在日常言语中却相对较少出现。