Suppr超能文献

苏格兰的战略环境评估在多大程度上考虑了人类健康?

How well do strategic environmental assessments in Scotland consider human health?

机构信息

Lothian NHS Board, Waverley Gate, 2-4 Waterloo Place, Edinburgh EH1 3EG, UK.

出版信息

Public Health. 2011 Sep;125(9):585-91. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is a systematic approach to identifying, describing, evaluating and reporting on the environmental - and health - effects of policies, plans and strategies. SEAs have potential to improve population health because they assess 'upstream' health determinants and recommend measures to improve these. The authors studied the range of health issues considered in SEAs in Scotland, and the evidence used in their assessment.

STUDY DESIGN

Documentary review of 62 consecutive SEA reports.

METHODS

Environmental reports were categorized by sector, and the health-related environmental problems, SEA objectives/criteria, differential impacts, evidence, recommended mitigation and monitoring were identified for each report.

RESULTS

Environmental reports identified many health-related issues, and set a wide range of health-related objectives/criteria, but these were inconsistent for SEAs assessing similar plans. Few identified differential impacts or mental health impacts. Mitigation focused on mitigating adverse impacts rather than enhancing positive impacts. It was unclear what health evidence was used to inform the judgements made in scoring the plans against SEA objectives.

CONCLUSIONS

Many SEAs in Scotland adopt a wide perspective on health, but most fail to identify differential impacts. Health involvement in scoping of health issues and better use of health evidence may enhance their quality.

摘要

目的

战略环境评估(SEA)是一种系统的方法,用于识别、描述、评估和报告政策、规划和战略对环境和健康的影响。SEA 有可能改善人口健康,因为它们评估“上游”健康决定因素,并建议采取措施改善这些因素。作者研究了苏格兰 SEA 中考虑的一系列健康问题,以及在评估中使用的证据。

研究设计

对 62 项连续 SEA 报告进行文献回顾。

方法

根据部门对环境报告进行分类,并确定每个报告中的与健康相关的环境问题、SEA 目标/标准、差异影响、证据、建议的缓解措施和监测。

结果

环境报告确定了许多与健康相关的问题,并制定了广泛的与健康相关的目标/标准,但对于评估类似计划的 SEA 而言,这些标准并不一致。很少有报告确定差异影响或心理健康影响。缓解措施侧重于减轻不利影响,而不是增强积极影响。尚不清楚用于告知根据 SEA 目标对计划进行评分的判断的健康证据是什么。

结论

苏格兰的许多 SEA 对健康采取了广泛的观点,但大多数未能确定差异影响。在确定健康问题的范围和更好地利用健康证据方面的参与,可能会提高其质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验