Centre for Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Plant Cell. 2011 Aug;23(8):3007-25. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.085480. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
We tested if different classes of vacuolar cargo reach the vacuole via distinct mechanisms by interference at multiple steps along the transport route. We show that nucleotide-free mutants of low molecular weight GTPases, including Rab11, the Rab5 members Rha1 and Ara6, and the tonoplast-resident Rab7, caused induced secretion of both lytic and storage vacuolar cargo. In situ analysis in leaf epidermis cells indicates a sequential action of Rab11, Rab5, and Rab7 GTPases. Compared with Rab5 members, mutant Rab11 mediates an early transport defect interfering with the arrival of cargo at prevacuoles, while mutant Rab7 inhibits the final delivery to the vacuole and increases cargo levels in prevacuoles. In contrast with soluble cargo, membrane cargo may follow different routes. Tonoplast targeting of an α-TIP chimera was impaired by nucleotide-free Rha1, Ara6, and Rab7 similar to soluble cargo. By contrast, the tail-anchored tonoplast SNARE Vam3 shares only the Rab7-mediated vacuolar deposition step. The most marked difference was observed for the calcineurin binding protein CBL6, which was insensitive to all Rab mutants tested. Unlike soluble cargo, α-TIP and Vam3, CBL6 transport to the vacuole was COPII independent. The results indicate that soluble vacuolar proteins follow a single route to vacuoles, while membrane spanning proteins may use at least three different transport mechanisms.
我们通过在运输途径的多个步骤进行干扰,测试了不同类别的液泡货物是否通过不同的机制到达液泡。我们表明,包括 Rab11 在内的小分子 GTPase 的无核苷酸突变体、Rab5 成员 Rha1 和 Ara6 以及液泡驻留的 Rab7,都会导致溶酶体和储存液泡货物的诱导分泌。在叶表皮细胞中的原位分析表明 Rab11、Rab5 和 Rab7 GTPase 具有顺序作用。与 Rab5 成员相比,突变 Rab11 介导早期运输缺陷,干扰货物到达前液泡,而突变 Rab7 抑制最终递送至液泡,并增加前液泡中的货物水平。与可溶性货物相比,膜货物可能遵循不同的途径。无核苷酸的 Rha1、Ara6 和 Rab7 对 α-TIP 嵌合体的液泡靶向作用受损,类似于可溶性货物。相比之下,尾部锚定的液泡 SNARE Vam3 仅共享 Rab7 介导的液泡沉积步骤。观察到的最显著差异是钙调神经磷酸酶结合蛋白 CBL6,它对所有测试的 Rab 突变体均不敏感。与可溶性货物、α-TIP 和 Vam3 不同,CBL6 向液泡的运输不依赖于 COPII。结果表明,可溶性液泡蛋白沿单一途径运输至液泡,而跨膜蛋白可能使用至少三种不同的运输机制。