Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜内镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石:最佳技术是什么?

Laparoendoscopic management of concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: what is the best technique?

作者信息

El-Geidie Ahmed Abdel-Raouf

机构信息

Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Jehan st, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Aug;21(4):282-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182218908.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The intraoperative use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a safe, single-stage option for the management of concomitant gallstones (GS) and common bile duct stones (CBDS). This study aims to compare between 2 techniques of combined laparoendoscopic management, which are laparoendoscopic Rendez-vous (LC/LERV) technique and standard ERCP after the completion of LC intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOES).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with GS and suspected CBDS were included. They were divided into 2 groups; LC/LERV and LC/IOES. Both groups were compared for failure of endoscopic sphincterotomy/stone extraction, operative time, conversion rate, mortality/morbidity, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Between October 2007 and February 2010, 98 patients with GS and CBDS were eligible for inclusion in the study. They were prospectively randomized into 2 groups; LC/LERV (N=45) and LC/IOES (N=53). There were no differences in preoperative parameters between both groups. There was a significant difference in operative time (shorter for LC/IOES). No difference was noted in success/failure rate, post-ERCP pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Standard ERCP after the completion of LC and LC/LERV are valid single-session management for CBD stones, but LC-ERCP may be preferred.

摘要

背景与研究目的

在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)期间术中使用内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是一种安全的单阶段方法,用于处理合并存在的胆结石(GS)和胆总管结石(CBDS)。本研究旨在比较两种联合腹腔镜内镜治疗技术,即腹腔镜内镜会师术(LC/LERV)技术和在LC完成后进行术中内镜括约肌切开术(IOES)后的标准ERCP。

患者与方法

纳入患有GS且怀疑有CBDS的患者。他们被分为两组;LC/LERV组和LC/IOES组。比较两组在内镜括约肌切开术/结石取出失败率、手术时间、中转率、死亡率/发病率以及住院时间方面的差异。

结果

在2007年10月至2010年2月期间,98例患有GS和CBDS的患者符合纳入本研究的条件。他们被前瞻性随机分为两组;LC/LERV组(N = 45)和LC/IOES组(N = 53)。两组术前参数无差异。手术时间存在显著差异(LC/IOES组较短)。在成功/失败率、ERCP术后胰腺炎方面未发现差异。

结论

LC完成后进行的标准ERCP和LC/LERV都是处理CBD结石的有效的单阶段治疗方法,但LC - ERCP可能更受青睐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验