Wiernik G, Bates T D, Bleehen N M, Brindle J M, Bullimore J, Fowler J F, Haybittle J L, Howard N, Laing A H, Lindup R
British Institute of Radiology, London.
Br J Radiol. 1990 Mar;63(747):169-80. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-63-747-169.
The 10 year follow-up of a clinical trial involving the comparison of 3F/wk versus 5F/wk in radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx has now been completed. The trial involved an intake of 734 patients between 1966 and 1975. The classification of all patients has been revised to conform with the latest TNM publication. A reduction in total dose was made for 3F/wk compared with 5F/wk. This varied between 13% and 11% in centres treating over 3 weeks and 6 weeks, respectively. No statistically significant differences have been found between the two arms (3F/wk versus 5F/wk) of the trial in any of the main group analyses. A number of sub-group analyses relating to survival, tumour-free and laryngectomy-free rates and to the comparison of acute or late normal-tissue radiation damage have also been performed. No differences have been found that could be considered to be statistically significant in relation to the particular sub-group. Previous interim reports suggested minor differences in sub-group analyses between the 3F/wk and 5F/wk regimes in this trial; these have diminished now that the full follow-up data are available. This trial has provided evidence on which clinicians may base their choice between either a 3F/wk fractionation regime or a conventional 5F/wk treatment protocol in the treatment of carcinoma of the laryngo-pharynx.
一项关于喉和下咽鳞状细胞癌放疗中3次/周与5次/周方案对比的临床试验现已完成10年随访。该试验纳入了1966年至1975年间的734例患者。所有患者的分类已根据最新的TNM出版物进行修订。与5次/周方案相比,3次/周方案的总剂量有所降低。在分别治疗超过3周和6周的中心,总剂量降低幅度分别在13%至11%之间。在该试验的任何主要组分析中,试验的两个组(3次/周与5次/周)之间均未发现具有统计学意义的差异。还进行了一些与生存率、无瘤和无喉切除术率以及急性或晚期正常组织辐射损伤比较相关的亚组分析。在特定亚组方面,未发现具有统计学意义的差异。之前的中期报告表明,在该试验中,3次/周和5次/周方案在亚组分析中存在细微差异;现在有了完整的随访数据,这些差异已减小。该试验为临床医生在喉咽癌治疗中选择3次/周分割方案或传统的5次/周治疗方案提供了依据。