Haybittle J L, Alcock C J, Fowler J F, Hopewell J W, Rezvani M, Wiernik G
MRC Cancer Trials Office, Cambridge, UK.
Br J Cancer. 1990 Oct;62(4):687-91. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.358.
A study has been made of the way in which the number of events available for analysis in a clinical trial was dependent on the recruitment period, the maximum follow-up time on individual patients and the length of time between the start of the trial and its analysis. The events considered were deaths, local recurrences and late radiation effects on normal tissue in patients treated for cancer of the laryngo-pharynx by two different fractionation regimes. The relationship is demonstrated between the number of events and the 95% confidence intervals that can be placed on differences between results in the two arms of the trial. It was found, in this particular trial, that no significant improvement in precision was gained by following up patients beyond 5 years or carrying out the analysis later than 2 years after the end of recruitment. The results are discussed in the context of the initial design of clinical trials, particularly those in which the aim is to test therapeutic equivalence.
一项研究探讨了在临床试验中可供分析的事件数量取决于招募期、个体患者的最长随访时间以及试验开始至分析之间的时间长度的方式。所考虑的事件包括接受两种不同分割方案治疗的喉咽癌患者的死亡、局部复发以及对正常组织的晚期放射效应。文中展示了事件数量与可用于试验两组结果差异的95%置信区间之间的关系。在该特定试验中发现,随访患者超过5年或在招募结束后2年以后进行分析,在精度方面并未获得显著提高。在临床试验的初始设计背景下,特别是那些旨在测试治疗等效性的试验,对结果进行了讨论。