Suppr超能文献

研究风险知识库的建议和原型,以改进研究参与者的保护。

A proposal and prototype for a Research Risk Repository to improve the protection of research participants.

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Ethics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2011 Dec;8(6):705-15. doi: 10.1177/1740774511414595. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate and consistent risk assessment is vital for the protection of research participants. Yet, current evaluation of the risks of research interventions often does not take into account the relevant empirical data. This approach raises concern that current practice may not be protecting research participants adequately, or that it may be thwarting acceptable research.

PURPOSE

To propose and evaluate the possibility of creating and maintaining a Research Risk Repository which would make empirical data on the risks of research interventions available to institutional review boards, investigators, funders, and others.

METHODS

Analysis of the usefulness of a Research Risk Repository and evaluation of whether currently available empirical data are sufficient to establish such a repository.

RESULTS

Creation of a Research Risk Repository would provide a vital resource for systematically and accurately evaluating the risks of biomedical research. Realizing this goal requires data that have at least 4 characteristics: (1) trustworthy: to ensure credibility to all stakeholders; (2) robust: to support confident risk determinations; (3) inclusive: to cover all potential harms of the interventions under review; and (4) comprehensive: to determine which factors influence the risks of the interventions under review. Evaluation of existing data reveals that they satisfy these requirements for only a few research interventions and, even in those cases, only to a limited extent. Gaps in the currently available evidence highlight the need for systematic collection and maintenance of data on the risks posed by research interventions.

LIMITATIONS

Creation and maintenance of a Research Risk Repository would be costly and require regular updating as new data are collected, and new practices and interventions emerge.

CONCLUSIONS

A Research Risk Repository has the potential to significantly improve the consistency and accuracy of the evaluation of research risks. However, currently available data are generally insufficient for this purpose. Future collection and maintenance of data on the risks posed by research interventions will help to ensure that research participants receive appropriate protection and promote important research consistent with adequate subject protection.

摘要

背景

准确且一致的风险评估对于保护研究参与者至关重要。然而,当前对研究干预风险的评估通常并未考虑相关的经验数据。这种方法引发了人们的担忧,即当前的实践可能无法充分保护研究参与者,或者可能阻碍可接受的研究。

目的

提出并评估创建和维护研究风险存储库的可能性,该存储库将为机构审查委员会、研究人员、资助者和其他人员提供有关研究干预风险的经验数据。

方法

分析研究风险存储库的有用性,并评估当前可用的经验数据是否足以建立这样的存储库。

结果

创建研究风险存储库将为系统和准确地评估生物医学研究风险提供重要资源。实现这一目标需要满足至少 4 个特征的数据:(1)可信:确保所有利益相关者的可信度;(2)稳健:支持有信心的风险确定;(3)全面:涵盖所审查干预措施的所有潜在危害;(4)综合:确定哪些因素影响所审查干预措施的风险。对现有数据的评估表明,它们仅满足少数研究干预措施的这些要求,并且即使在这些情况下,也只是在有限的程度上满足。现有证据中的差距突出表明需要系统地收集和维护有关研究干预措施所带来风险的数据。

局限性

创建和维护研究风险存储库的成本高,需要定期更新,因为会收集新数据,并且新的实践和干预措施会不断出现。

结论

研究风险存储库有潜力显著提高研究风险评估的一致性和准确性。然而,目前可用的数据通常不足以实现这一目标。未来对研究干预措施所带来风险的数据的收集和维护将有助于确保研究参与者得到适当的保护,并促进符合充分主体保护的重要研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验