• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The return trip effect: why the return trip often seems to take less time.返程效应:为什么返程往往看起来用时更少。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):827-32. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0150-5.
2
Anticipated ambiguity prolongs the present: Evidence of a return trip effect.预期的歧义延长了当下:回程效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Nov;145(11):1415-1419. doi: 10.1037/xge0000228. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
The return trip is felt shorter only postdictively: A psychophysiological study of the return trip effect [corrected].返程之旅只有在事后回顾时才会让人感觉更短:返程效应的心理生理学研究[已修正]
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127779. eCollection 2015.
4
Self-motion perception compresses time experienced in return travel.自我运动感知会压缩返程中所经历的时间。
Perception. 2011;40(4):497-9. doi: 10.1068/p6885.
5
Incidence and precipitating factors of morbidity among Israeli travelers abroad.以色列海外旅行者发病的发病率及诱发因素。
J Travel Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;9(5):227-32. doi: 10.2310/7060.2002.24202.
6
Developing a Barriers Scale in the Context of Travel: TRIP.旅行背景下的障碍量表的制定:TRIP。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.424. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
7
Low transmission rate of 2009 H1N1 Influenza during a long-distance bus trip.2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感在长途客车旅行中的低传播率。
Infection. 2011 Apr;39(2):149-53. doi: 10.1007/s15010-011-0084-x. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
8
A jeep trip with young adult cancer survivors: lessons to be learned.与年轻成年癌症幸存者的吉普车之旅:可吸取的经验教训。
Support Care Cancer. 2003 Apr;11(4):201-6. doi: 10.1007/s00520-002-0426-4. Epub 2003 Jan 25.
9
[Risks of psychiatric decompensation in travel].旅行中精神失代偿的风险
Rev Prat. 2015 Apr;65(4):509-12.
10
Mechanisms underlying skilled anticipation and recognition in a dynamic and temporally constrained domain.动态且时间受限领域中熟练预判和识别的潜在机制。
Memory. 2011 Feb;19(2):155-68. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.541466. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial Compression in Memory: How Repeated Walks on Familiar Routes Shorten Perceived Distance.记忆中的空间压缩:熟悉路线上的重复行走如何缩短感知距离。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 22;15(4):404. doi: 10.3390/bs15040404.
2
The Influence of Stimuli Valence and Arousal on Spatio-Temporal Representation of a Route.刺激效价和唤醒对路线时空表征的影响。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 19;11(6):814. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060814.
3
Development of Measures of Perceived Neighborhood Environmental Attributes Influencing, and Perceived Barriers to Engagement in, Healthy Behaviors for Older Chinese Immigrants to Australia.开发用于评估感知邻里环境属性、感知健康行为障碍的测量工具,以了解影响澳大利亚老年华人群体参与健康行为的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;18(9):4531. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094531.
4
Familiarity expands space and contracts time.熟悉会拓展空间,压缩时间。
Hippocampus. 2017 Jan;27(1):12-16. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22672. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
The return trip is felt shorter only postdictively: A psychophysiological study of the return trip effect [corrected].返程之旅只有在事后回顾时才会让人感觉更短:返程效应的心理生理学研究[已修正]
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127779. eCollection 2015.
6
Belief in optimism might be more problematic than actual optimism.对乐观主义的信仰可能比实际的乐观主义更成问题。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 19;5:624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00624. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.前瞻性和回溯性时长判断:元分析综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):184-97. doi: 10.3758/BF03209393.
2
Correcting memory improves accuracy of predicted task duration.校正记忆可提高预测任务持续时间的准确性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Sep;14(3):266-75. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.266.
3
Bias in memory predicts bias in estimation of future task duration.记忆偏差预示着对未来任务持续时间估计的偏差。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Apr;35(3):557-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03193294.
4
Underestimating the duration of future events: memory incorrectly used or memory bias?低估未来事件的持续时间:记忆使用不当还是记忆偏差?
Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;131(5):738-56. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.738.
5
Routine and the perception of time.日常事务与时间观念
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Dec;132(4):543-50. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.543.
6
New phenomena in apparent duration distance and speed.视在时长、距离和速度中的新现象。
Nature. 1962 Dec 22;196:1233-4. doi: 10.1038/1961233a0.
7
Temporal experience.时间体验
Psychol Bull. 1960 May;57:213-36. doi: 10.1037/h0041410.
8
A new phenomenon in time judgment.
Nature. 1953 Nov 14;172(4385):901. doi: 10.1038/172901a0.
9
The role of learning in remembered duration.学习在记忆时长中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Sep;26(5):903-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03201172.
10
Task predictability and remembered duration.任务可预测性与记忆时长。
Percept Psychophys. 1998 Jul;60(5):768-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03206062.

返程效应:为什么返程往往看起来用时更少。

The return trip effect: why the return trip often seems to take less time.

机构信息

Social Psychology & TIBER, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000LE, Tilburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):827-32. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0150-5.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-011-0150-5
PMID:21861201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3179583/
Abstract

Three studies confirm the existence of the return trip effect: The return trip often seems shorter than the initial trip, even though the distance traveled and the actual time spent traveling are identical. A pretest shows that people indeed experience a return trip effect regularly, and the effect was found on a bus trip (Study 1), a bicycle trip (Study 2), and when participants watched a video of someone else traveling (Study 3). The return trip effect also existed when another, equidistant route was taken on the return trip, showing that it is not familiarity with the route that causes this effect. Rather, it seems that a violation of expectations causes this effect.

摘要

三项研究证实了返程效应的存在

返程往往看起来比初始行程短,即使行驶的距离和实际旅行时间相同。预测试表明,人们确实经常经历返程效应,而且这种效应在公共汽车旅行(研究 1)、自行车旅行(研究 2)以及当参与者观看他人旅行的视频时(研究 3)都存在。当在返程中选择另一条等距的路线时,返程效应仍然存在,这表明不是对路线的熟悉导致了这种效应。相反,似乎是违反预期导致了这种效应。