Maschmeyer G, Link H, Hiddemann W, Meyer P, Helmerking M, Adam D
Ev. Krankenhaus Essen-Werden, BRD.
Onkologie. 1990 Feb;13(1):38-42. doi: 10.1159/000216717.
In a prospective, randomized multicenter trial of the Paul Ehrlich society different concepts for sequential empirical antimicrobial strategy for the treatment of patients with neutropenia less than 1.0/nl and fever greater than 38.5 degrees C and/or documented infection were studied. In phase I, patients with unexplained fever (FUO) were randomized for the combination of acylaminopenicillin plus aminoglycoside or third-generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycoside or double beta lactam therapy. Non-responders received additional vancomycin or all three substances of phase I in phase II. In phase III, all patients with persistent fever were then treated with amphotericin B plus 5-flucytosine and rifampin and randomized for the continuation of the double beta lactam regimen or additional imipenem/cilastatin. 667 (52.9%) of 1260 evaluable patients had FUO during the whole study period, of which 62.5% could be cured in phase I, 43.2% of non-responders in phase II and 55% of persistently febrile patients in phase III. The overall rate of complete response was 79.5%. 2.8% were non-responders, 11.7% were not evaluable for response and 40 patients (6%) died during the study, 24 (60%) of whom due to the underlying disease or the toxicity of antileukemic therapy. A significant difference between the treatment groups could not be detected in either of the three study phases.
在保罗·埃利希协会进行的一项前瞻性、随机多中心试验中,研究了针对中性粒细胞计数低于1.0/nl且发热高于38.5摄氏度和/或有明确感染的患者的序贯经验性抗菌策略的不同概念。在第一阶段,不明原因发热(FUO)患者被随机分配接受酰氨基青霉素加氨基糖苷类药物联合治疗、第三代头孢菌素加氨基糖苷类药物联合治疗或双β-内酰胺治疗。无反应者在第二阶段接受额外的万古霉素或第一阶段的所有三种药物治疗。在第三阶段,所有持续发热的患者随后接受两性霉素B加5-氟胞嘧啶和利福平治疗,并被随机分配继续使用双β-内酰胺方案或加用亚胺培南/西司他丁。在1260例可评估患者中,667例(52.9%)在整个研究期间出现不明原因发热,其中62.5%在第一阶段治愈,第二阶段无反应者中的43.2%治愈,第三阶段持续发热患者中的55%治愈。完全缓解的总体率为79.5%。2.8%为无反应者,11.7%无法评估反应情况,40例患者(6%)在研究期间死亡,其中24例(60%)死于基础疾病或抗白血病治疗的毒性反应。在三个研究阶段中的任何一个阶段,均未检测到治疗组之间存在显著差异。