• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验中的中心间差异和治疗效果:颅脑损伤的案例研究。

Between-centre differences and treatment effects in randomized controlled trials: a case study in traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, P,O, Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2011 Aug 25;12:201. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-201.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-12-201
PMID:21867540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170218/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), large between-centre differences in outcome exist and many clinicians believe that such differences influence estimation of the treatment effect in randomized controlled trial (RCTs). The aim of this study was to assess the influence of between-centre differences in outcome on the estimated treatment effect in a large RCT in TBI.

METHODS

We used data from the MRC CRASH trial on the efficacy of corticosteroid infusion in patients with TBI. We analyzed the effect of the treatment on 14 day mortality with fixed effect logistic regression. Next we used random effects logistic regression with a random intercept to estimate the treatment effect taking into account between-centre differences in outcome. Between-centre differences in outcome were expressed with a 95% range of odds ratios (OR) for centres compared to the average, based on the variance of the random effects (tau2). A random effects logistic regression model with random slopes was used to allow the treatment effect to vary by centre. The variation in treatment effect between the centres was expressed in a 95% range of the estimated treatment ORs.

RESULTS

In 9978 patients from 237 centres, 14-day mortality was 19.5%. Mortality was higher in the treatment group (OR = 1.22, p = 0.00010). Using a random effects model showed large between-centre differences in outcome (95% range of centre effects: 0.27- 3.71), but did not substantially change the estimated treatment effect (OR = 1.24, p = 0.00003). There was limited, although statistically significant, between-centre variation in the treatment effect (OR = 1.22, 95% treatment OR range: 1.17-1.26).

CONCLUSION

Large between-centre differences in outcome do not necessarily affect the estimated treatment effect in RCTs, in contrast to current beliefs in the clinical area of TBI.

摘要

背景

在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中,中心之间的结果存在很大差异,许多临床医生认为这种差异会影响随机对照试验(RCT)中治疗效果的估计。本研究旨在评估 TBI 中一项大型 RCT 中结果的中心间差异对估计治疗效果的影响。

方法

我们使用 MRC CRASH 试验中关于皮质类固醇输注治疗 TBI 患者疗效的数据。我们使用固定效应逻辑回归分析治疗对 14 天死亡率的影响。接下来,我们使用具有随机截距的随机效应逻辑回归来估计考虑到结果的中心间差异的治疗效果。基于随机效应的方差(tau2),使用 95%的比值比(OR)范围来表示中心之间的结果差异,该范围用于与平均值相比的中心。使用具有随机斜率的随机效应逻辑回归模型来允许治疗效果因中心而异。中心之间治疗效果的差异以估计治疗 OR 的 95%范围表示。

结果

在 237 个中心的 9978 名患者中,14 天死亡率为 19.5%。治疗组死亡率较高(OR=1.22,p=0.00010)。使用随机效应模型显示出结果的中心间存在很大差异(中心效应的 95%范围:0.27-3.71),但并未实质上改变估计的治疗效果(OR=1.24,p=0.00003)。虽然存在统计学意义,但治疗效果的中心间差异有限(OR=1.22,95%治疗 OR 范围:1.17-1.26)。

结论

与 TBI 临床领域的当前观念相反,中心间结果的很大差异不一定会影响 RCT 中估计的治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93f9/3170218/d79414ef5c9b/1745-6215-12-201-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93f9/3170218/ce1b0a1dd850/1745-6215-12-201-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93f9/3170218/d79414ef5c9b/1745-6215-12-201-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93f9/3170218/ce1b0a1dd850/1745-6215-12-201-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93f9/3170218/d79414ef5c9b/1745-6215-12-201-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Between-centre differences and treatment effects in randomized controlled trials: a case study in traumatic brain injury.随机对照试验中的中心间差异和治疗效果:颅脑损伤的案例研究。
Trials. 2011 Aug 25;12:201. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-201.
2
Covariate adjustment increased power in randomized controlled trials: an example in traumatic brain injury.协变量调整增加了随机对照试验的功效:创伤性脑损伤的一个例子。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 May;65(5):474-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
3
Validation of a prognostic score for early mortality in severe head injury cases.严重颅脑损伤病例早期死亡率预后评分的验证
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121(6):1314-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS131874. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
4
Predicted Unfavorable Neurologic Outcome Is Overestimated by the Marshall Computed Tomography Score, Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH), and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) Models in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Managed with Early Decompressive Craniectomy.在接受早期减压性颅骨切除术治疗的重度创伤性脑损伤患者中,Marshall计算机断层扫描评分、重度颅脑损伤后皮质类固醇随机试验(CRASH)以及创伤性脑损伤临床试验预后与分析国际任务组(IMPACT)模型对不良神经学预后的预测存在高估。
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:554-558. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.051. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
5
Prognostic value of major extracranial injury in traumatic brain injury: an individual patient data meta-analysis in 39,274 patients.颅脑损伤中大颅外损伤的预后价值:39274 例患者的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Apr;70(4):811-8; discussion 818. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318235d640.
6
Outcome Prediction of TBI: Are There Parameters That Affect the IMPACT and CRASH Models?颅脑创伤结局预测:是否存在影响 IMPACT 和 CRASH 模型的参数?
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e590-e596. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.134. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
7
Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study.与严重创伤性脑损伤患者停止维持生命疗法相关的死亡率:一项加拿大多中心队列研究。
CMAJ. 2011 Oct 4;183(14):1581-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101786. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
8
Large between-center differences in outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in the international mission on prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury (IMPACT) study.国际创伤性脑损伤预后和临床试验设计研究(IMPACT)中,中度和重度创伤性脑损伤后结果的中心间存在较大差异。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Mar;68(3):601-7; discussion 607-8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209333b.
9
CRASH-2 (Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage) intracranial bleeding study: the effect of tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury--a nested randomised, placebo-controlled trial.CRASH-2(严重出血中抗纤维蛋白溶解剂的临床随机对照试验)颅内出血研究:氨甲环酸对创伤性脑损伤的影响——一项嵌套随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(13):iii-xii, 1-54. doi: 10.3310/hta16130.
10
Logistic random effects regression models: a comparison of statistical packages for binary and ordinal outcomes.逻辑随机效应回归模型:用于二进制和有序结果的统计软件包的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 May 23;11:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-77.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized Evaluation of Surgery in Elderly with Traumatic Acute SubDural Hematoma (RESET-ASDH trial): study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with multicenter parallel group design.老年创伤性急性硬膜下血肿手术的随机评估(RESET-ASDH试验):一项采用多中心平行组设计的实用随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2022 Mar 29;23(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06184-1.
2
Including random centre effects in design, analysis and presentation of multi-centre trials.在多中心试验的设计、分析和报告中包括随机中心效应。
Trials. 2021 May 22;22(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05266-w.
3
Pediatric ECMO Research: The Case for Collaboration.

本文引用的文献

1
Large between-center differences in outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in the international mission on prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury (IMPACT) study.国际创伤性脑损伤预后和临床试验设计研究(IMPACT)中,中度和重度创伤性脑损伤后结果的中心间存在较大差异。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Mar;68(3):601-7; discussion 607-8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209333b.
2
Multicenter trial of early hypothermia in severe brain injury.严重脑损伤早期低温治疗的多中心试验。
J Neurotrauma. 2009 Mar;26(3):393-7. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0556.
3
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.
儿科体外膜肺氧合研究:合作的理由。
Front Pediatr. 2018 Sep 10;6:240. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00240. eCollection 2018.
4
Reference effect measures for quantifying, comparing and visualizing variation from random and fixed effects in non-normal multilevel models, with applications to site variation in medical procedure use and outcomes.参考效应度量,用于量化、比较和可视化非正态多水平模型中的随机和固定效应差异,应用于医疗程序使用和结果中的部位差异。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0517-7.
5
A nested mechanistic sub-study into the effect of tranexamic acid versus placebo on intracranial haemorrhage and cerebral ischaemia in isolated traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (CRASH-3 Trial Intracranial Bleeding Mechanistic Sub-Study [CRASH-3 IBMS]).一项关于氨甲环酸与安慰剂对孤立性创伤性脑损伤颅内出血和脑缺血影响的嵌套机制亚研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案(CRASH-3试验颅内出血机制亚研究[CRASH-3 IBMS])
Trials. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2073-6.
6
Bringing attention into higher focus within the traumatic brain injury research agenda.将注意力在创伤性脑损伤研究议程中提升到更高的关注度。
Transl Pediatr. 2015 Oct;4(4):320-2. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2015.10.05.
7
Advancing care for traumatic brain injury: findings from the IMPACT studies and perspectives on future research.推进创伤性脑损伤的护理:IMPACT 研究的结果及对未来研究的展望。
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Dec;12(12):1200-10. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70234-5. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
8
Toward an international initiative for traumatic brain injury research.迈向创伤性脑损伤研究的国际倡议。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Jul 15;30(14):1211-22. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2896. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
9
Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: results from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.颅内压监测在严重创伤性脑损伤中的应用:来自美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划的结果。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Oct 15;30(20):1737-46. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2802. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
预测创伤性脑损伤后的预后:基于入院特征的预后评分的制定与国际验证
PLoS Med. 2008 Aug 5;5(8):e165; discussion e165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165.
4
Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults.成人中度和重度创伤性脑损伤
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Aug;7(8):728-41. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70164-9.
5
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.预测创伤性脑损伤后的结局:基于大量国际患者队列的实用预后模型。
BMJ. 2008 Feb 23;336(7641):425-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
6
A comparison of methods for combining quality and efficiency performance measures: profiling the value of hospital care following acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后综合质量与效率绩效指标的方法比较:剖析医院护理价值
Stat Med. 2008 Apr 30;27(9):1351-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.3082.
7
Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study.创伤性脑损伤的预后与临床试验设计:IMPACT研究
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):232-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0024.
8
Efficacy and safety of dexanabinol in severe traumatic brain injury: results of a phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.右泛醇治疗重度创伤性脑损伤的疗效与安全性:一项III期随机、安慰剂对照临床试验的结果
Lancet Neurol. 2006 Jan;5(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70253-2.
9
Treating individuals 3: from subgroups to individuals: general principles and the example of carotid endarterectomy.治疗个体3:从亚组到个体:一般原则及颈动脉内膜切除术实例
Lancet. 2005;365(9455):256-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17746-0.
10
Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial.静脉注射皮质类固醇对10008例有临床显著意义的头部损伤成人14天内死亡的影响(MRC CRASH试验):随机安慰剂对照试验
Lancet. 2004;364(9442):1321-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17188-2.