Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec-Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus, Traumatologie-Urgence-Soins Intensifs, Université Laval, Québec, Que.
CMAJ. 2011 Oct 4;183(14):1581-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101786. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
Severe traumatic brain injury often leads to death from withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, although prognosis is difficult to determine.
To evaluate variation in mortality following the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy and hospital mortality in patients with critical illness and severe traumatic brain injury, we conducted a two-year multicentre retrospective cohort study in six Canadian level-one trauma centres. The effect of centre on hospital mortality and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for baseline patient-level covariates (sex, age, pupillary reactivity and score on the Glasgow coma scale).
We randomly selected 720 patients with traumatic brain injury for our study. The overall hospital mortality among these patients was 228/720 (31.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 28.4%-35.2%) and ranged from 10.8% to 44.2% across centres (χ(2) test for overall difference, p < 0.001). Most deaths (70.2% [160/228], 95% CI 63.9%-75.7%) were associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, ranging from 45.0% (18/40) to 86.8% (46/53) (χ(2) test for overall difference, p < 0.001) across centres. Adjusted odd ratios (ORs) for the effect of centre on hospital mortality ranged from 0.61 to 1.55 (p < 0.001). The incidence of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy varied by centre, with ORs ranging from 0.42 to 2.40 (p = 0.001). About one half of deaths that occurred following the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies happened within the first three days of care.
We observed significant variation in mortality across centres. This may be explained in part by regional variations in physician, family or community approaches to the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. Considering the high proportion of early deaths associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy and the limited accuracy of current prognostic indicators, caution should be used regarding early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy following severe traumatic brain injury.
严重创伤性脑损伤常导致生命支持治疗的撤机死亡,尽管预后难以确定。
为了评估重症患者和严重创伤性脑损伤患者撤机后死亡率的变化和院内死亡率,我们在加拿大 6 个一级创伤中心进行了为期两年的多中心回顾性队列研究。使用多变量逻辑回归评估中心对医院死亡率和撤机的影响,调整了基线患者水平的协变量(性别、年龄、瞳孔反应和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分)。
我们随机选择了 720 名创伤性脑损伤患者进行研究。这些患者的总体院内死亡率为 228/720(31.7%,95%置信区间[CI]28.4%-35.2%),各中心之间的死亡率范围为 10.8%-44.2%(总体差异 χ2检验,p<0.001)。大多数死亡(70.2%[160/228],95%CI63.9%-75.7%)与撤机相关,各中心之间的死亡率范围为 45.0%(18/40)至 86.8%(46/53)(总体差异 χ2检验,p<0.001)。中心对医院死亡率的调整比值比(OR)范围为 0.61 至 1.55(p<0.001)。撤机的发生率因中心而异,OR 范围为 0.42 至 2.40(p=0.001)。撤机后发生的死亡中有一半左右发生在护理的头三天内。
我们观察到各中心之间的死亡率存在显著差异。这可能部分解释为医生、家庭或社区在撤机生命支持治疗方面的区域差异。考虑到与撤机相关的早期死亡比例较高,以及当前预后指标的准确性有限,对于严重创伤性脑损伤患者,应谨慎考虑早期撤机生命支持治疗。