Dardenne Philippe
Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
J Physiol Paris. 2011 Dec;105(4-6):149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
Based on our experience of time as a dimension of our life, it appears a strong opposition between the time of the session and that of the narration of the cure. Indeed, the session may be conceived as relevant of an experimental methodology, reproducible during the time of the session, so that activation of some brain areas may be revealed by brain imaging methods. Given the recent findings on empathy, brain imaging should be applied to the patient but also to the therapist. Inversely, brain imaging might be not adapted to deal with the course of the cure, along the sessions, to disclose possible neuro-physiological reorganizations matching psychic improvement. The patient builds his/her personal history in order to be heard by the therapist. Transference and countertransference have here a heavy impact. It seems more adequate to use historical methods to deal with these data: time does not duplicate. However, Kandel proposes to make psychoanalysis more scientific by using brain imaging to show that some functional reorganization of brain areas could be the result of psychoanalysis. Unfortunately, the map cannot be confused with the territory. The question of the scientific dimension of Human Sciences and of History remains widely opened. Great authors, such as Balzac and Proust thought that their work contributed to scientific psychology. Their legacy in this field appears important to take into account.
基于我们将时间视为生活维度的经验，治疗时段的时间与治疗叙述的时间之间似乎存在强烈的对立。的确，治疗时段可被视为与一种实验方法相关，在治疗时段内可重复，这样一些脑区的激活可能会通过脑成像方法揭示出来。鉴于最近关于共情的研究发现，脑成像不仅应应用于患者，也应应用于治疗师。相反，脑成像可能不适用于处理整个疗程中治疗的进展情况，以揭示与心理改善相匹配的可能的神经生理重组。患者构建他/她的个人经历以便被治疗师倾听。这里移情和反移情有着重大影响。使用历史方法来处理这些数据似乎更为合适：时间不会重复。然而，坎德尔提议通过使用脑成像来使精神分析更具科学性，以表明脑区的一些功能重组可能是精神分析的结果。不幸的是，地图不能与地域相混淆。人文科学和历史的科学维度问题仍然广泛存在。伟大的作家，如巴尔扎克和普鲁斯特，认为他们的作品对科学心理学有贡献。他们在这个领域的遗产似乎很重要，值得考虑。
