Mukhtar-Fayyad Dalia
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):e137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.042. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of 2 bioceramic-based materials, BioAggregate and iRoot, on human fibroblast MRC-5 cells.
Twenty-four disks of BioAggregate and iRoot SP materials were fabricated (2 × 5 mm). Disks were immersed in cell culture medium at 37°C for 5 days, and the extracts obtained were diluted with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle medium to achieve 5 concentrations (neat, 1/2, 1/10, 1/50, 1/100). Human fibroblast cells were incubated with each extract dilution for 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days, then cellular viability was assessed using MTT assay. Differences in mean cell viability values between materials were assessed by using the 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test.
A statistically significant difference was found between the experimental materials and the control group and between the 2 materials at the neat, 1/2, 1/10 concentrations for the 3 incubation periods (P < .001). The cytotoxic effect of both materials was concentration dependant.
Both BioAggregate and iRoot SP displayed an acceptable biocompatibility.
本研究旨在评估和比较两种生物陶瓷基材料BioAggregate和iRoot对人成纤维细胞MRC - 5的细胞毒性。
制备24个BioAggregate和iRoot SP材料的圆盘(2×5毫米)。将圆盘在37°C的细胞培养基中浸泡5天,获得的提取物用杜尔贝科改良伊格尔培养基稀释,以达到5种浓度(原液、1/2、1/10、1/50、1/100)。将人成纤维细胞与每种提取物稀释液孵育24小时、72小时和7天,然后使用MTT法评估细胞活力。通过单因素方差分析和Tukey检验评估材料之间平均细胞活力值的差异。
在3个孵育期的原液、1/2、1/10浓度下,实验材料与对照组之间以及两种材料之间均存在统计学显著差异(P <.001)。两种材料的细胞毒性均呈浓度依赖性。
BioAggregate和iRoot SP均表现出可接受的生物相容性。