Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2011 Oct;34(10):2174-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2399. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
Determine the efficacy of a home-based walking intervention to improve walking ability and quality of life in people with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
We conducted a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial within university-affiliated clinics in our local community. We randomized 145 participants (45 women) with diabetes and PAD to our intervention--a 6-month behavioral intervention targeting levels of readiness to engage in routine walking for exercise--versus attention control. Our primary outcome was 6-month change in maximal treadmill walking distance. Secondary outcomes included 3-month change in maximal walking distance, lower limb function (i.e., walking impairment scores), quality of life (Medical Outcomes Short Form Survey), exercise behaviors, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy at 3 and 6 months.
The mean age of participants was 66.5 (SD 10.1) years. Intervention and control groups did not differ significantly in 6-month change in maximal treadmill walking distance (average [SE] 24.5 [19.6] meters vs. 39.2 [19.6] meters; P = 0.60). Among secondary outcomes, for the intervention and control groups, respectively, average walking speed scores increased by 5.7 [2.2] units and decreased by 1.9 [2.8] units (P = 0.03); the mental health quality of life subscale score increased by 3.2 [1.5] and decreased by 2.4 [1.5] units (P = 0.01).
A home-based walking intervention did not improve walking distance but did improve walking speed and quality of life in people with diabetes and PAD. Clinicians should consider recommending home-based walking therapy for such patients.
确定基于家庭的步行干预在改善糖尿病和外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者步行能力和生活质量方面的效果。
我们在当地社区的大学附属医院内进行了一项随机、对照、单盲试验。我们将 145 名患有糖尿病和 PAD 的参与者(45 名女性)随机分为我们的干预组(一项针对日常步行锻炼准备程度的 6 个月行为干预)和对照组。我们的主要结局是 6 个月时最大跑步机步行距离的变化。次要结局包括 3 个月时最大步行距离的变化、下肢功能(即步行障碍评分)、生活质量(医疗结局短式调查)、运动行为、抑郁症状和 3 个月和 6 个月时的自我效能。
参与者的平均年龄为 66.5(10.1)岁。干预组和对照组在 6 个月时最大跑步机步行距离的变化(平均[SE] 24.5[19.6]米对 39.2[19.6]米;P=0.60)无显著差异。在次要结局方面,干预组和对照组的平均步行速度评分分别增加了 5.7[2.2]单位和减少了 1.9[2.8]单位(P=0.03);心理健康生活质量子量表评分分别增加了 3.2[1.5]和减少了 2.4[1.5]单位(P=0.01)。
基于家庭的步行干预并未改善步行距离,但改善了糖尿病和 PAD 患者的步行速度和生活质量。临床医生应考虑为这些患者推荐家庭步行治疗。