Figlio Karl, Jordanova Alix
Univ. of Essex, UK.
Psychoanal Hist. 2005;7(1):51-79. doi: 10.3366/pah.2005.7.1.51.
Since the time when Jung and Freud severed their friendship and their collegial relationship, the details and the causes of the rupture have occupied both clinicians and scholars. The intensity of their relationship, and the pain that its breakdown caused them, seem to have driven much of this work, and it remains difficult to understand and assess the differences between them, in theory and in practice. In the service of assessment, we provide here an English translation of Sándor Ferenczi's review of the work by Jung which symbolized the break, his "Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido" (1911/1912). It was the first, and the most thorough and systematic, treatment of Jung's work, written by one of Freud's star followers. We also provide an introduction, which overviews the preparation for a psychoanalytic reply to Jung, based heavily on correspondence, and suggests the need to attend to the differences in clinical methodology implied in the different concepts of the libido held by Freud and Jung.
自从荣格与弗洛伊德断绝友谊和合作关系以来,决裂的细节和原因一直吸引着临床医生和学者。他们关系的紧密程度,以及关系破裂给他们带来的痛苦,似乎推动了这项工作的大部分进展,而且在理论和实践中,仍然很难理解和评估他们之间的差异。为了进行评估,我们在此提供桑多尔·费伦齐对荣格作品的评论的英文翻译,该作品象征着他们的决裂,即荣格的《力比多的变化与象征》(1911/1912)。这是弗洛伊德的一位杰出追随者对荣格作品的首次、也是最全面系统的论述。我们还提供了一篇引言,该引言主要基于书信概述了对荣格进行精神分析回应的准备情况,并指出有必要关注弗洛伊德和荣格在力比多不同概念中所隐含的临床方法差异。