Nummedal Tara E
Department of History, Box N, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
Isis. 2011 Jun;102(2):330-7. doi: 10.1086/660142.
This essay considers the implications of a shift in focus from ideas to practices in the history of alchemy. On the one hand, it is argued, this new attention to practice highlights the diversity of ways that early modern Europeans engaged alchemy, ranging from the literary to the entrepreneurial and artisanal, as well as the broad range of social and cultural spaces that alchemists inhabited. At the same time, however, recent work has demonstrated what most alchemists shared-namely, a penchant for reading, writing, making, and doing, all at the same time. Any history of early modern alchemy, therefore, must attend to all of these practices, as well as the interplay among them. In this sense, alchemy offers a model for thinking and writing about early modern science more generally, particularly in light of recent work that has explored the intersection of scholarly, artisanal, and entrepreneurial forms of knowledge in the early modem period.
本文探讨了炼金术历史中从观念到实践的重点转变所带来的影响。一方面,有人认为,这种对实践的新关注凸显了早期现代欧洲人参与炼金术的方式的多样性,从文学到创业和手工艺,以及炼金术士所处的广泛社会和文化空间。然而,与此同时,最近的研究表明,大多数炼金术士都有一个共同之处,即同时热衷于阅读、写作、制作和实践。因此,任何早期现代炼金术的历史都必须关注所有这些实践,以及它们之间的相互作用。从这个意义上说,炼金术为更广泛地思考和书写早期现代科学提供了一个模式,特别是鉴于最近探索早期现代时期学术、手工艺和创业知识交叉点的研究。