Can Arnaud, Van Renterghem Timothy, Rademaker Michael, Dauwe Samuel, Thomas Pieter, De Baets Bernard, Botteldooren Dick
Acoustic Group, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
J Environ Monit. 2011 Oct;13(10):2710-9. doi: 10.1039/c1em10292c. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
Requirements for static (prediction of L(den) and diurnal averaged noise pattern) and dynamic (prediction of 15 min and 60 min evolution of L(Aeq) and statistical levels L(A90,)L(A50) and L(A10)) noise level monitoring are investigated in this paper. Noise levels are measured for 72 consecutive days at 5 neighboring streets in an inner-city noise measurement network in Gent, Flanders, Belgium. We present a method to make predictions based on a fixed monitoring station, combined with short-term sampling at temporary stations. It is shown that relying on a fixed station improves the estimation of L(den) at other locations, and allows for the reduction of the number of samples needed and their duration; L(den) is estimated with an error that does not exceed 1.5 dB(A) to 3.4 dB(A) according to the location, for 90% of the 3 × 15 min samples. Also the diurnal averaged noise pattern can be estimated with a good accuracy in this way. It was shown that there is an optimal location for the fixed station which can be found by short-term measurements only. Short-term level predictions were shown to be more difficult; 7 day samples were needed to build models able to estimate the evolution of L(Aeq,60min) with a RMSE ranging between 1.4 dB(A) and 3.7 dB(A). These higher values can be explained by the very pronounced short-term variations appearing in typical streets, which are not correlated between locations. On the other hand, moderately accurate predictions can be achieved, even based on short-term sampling (a 3 × 15 minute sampling duration seems to be sufficient for many of the accuracy goals set related to static and dynamic monitoring). Finally, the method proposed also allows for the prediction of the evolution of statistical indicators.
本文研究了静态(预测L(den)和日平均噪声模式)和动态(预测L(Aeq)的15分钟和60分钟变化以及统计水平L(A90)、L(A50)和L(A10))噪声水平监测的要求。在比利时弗拉芒大区根特市的一个市中心噪声测量网络中的5条相邻街道上,连续72天测量了噪声水平。我们提出了一种基于固定监测站并结合临时站点短期采样进行预测的方法。结果表明,依靠固定站点可以提高其他位置L(den)的估计精度,并减少所需样本数量及其持续时间;对于3×15分钟样本中的90%,根据位置不同,L(den)的估计误差不超过1.5 dB(A)至3.4 dB(A)。通过这种方式,日平均噪声模式也能以较高精度进行估计。结果表明,固定站点存在一个最佳位置,仅通过短期测量即可找到。短期水平预测显示更具难度;需要7天的样本才能建立能够估计L(Aeq,60min)变化的模型,其均方根误差(RMSE)在1.4 dB(A)至3.7 dB(A)之间。这些较高的值可以用典型街道中出现的非常明显的短期变化来解释,这些变化在不同位置之间不相关。另一方面,即使基于短期采样也能实现适度准确的预测(对于与静态和动态监测相关的许多设定精度目标,3×15分钟的采样持续时间似乎就足够了)。最后,所提出的方法还能够预测统计指标的变化。